Connecting The Concept Of Power-Greed...

with the thought of Ayn Rand, one finds what she called power lust, identified with an impulse to destroy. From The Left: Old And New, :"...the lust for power, i.e., the lust to destroy".

Parapundit Finds Alarming Story From South Africa

in which egalitarian policies generate damage to production
• South Africa Becomes Net Food Importer

With The Federal Reserve Buying Enormous Volume

of new and old credit, continuing at the same rate they would own all the treasury debts in private hands before long and that is inflationary. If not today, then before many months have passed, an inflationary effect should show

Another View Of The Question Of Yesterday's Post

on why academia is left-heavy, from Dr John J. Ray: my own explanation. Who also quotes a Schumpeterian view: More here

A Positive Feedback Loop Between Indoctrination For

the equality of potential among human lineages, and the growth of government schools, is part of the explanation of how such schools become left-heavy. When these schools reach their saturation point, becoming no longer capable of recruiting a larger percentage into their precincts, the feedback loop goes neutral, no longer positive.

The Left Is Unprincipled Insofar As It Can Join Forces

with the more terroristic elements of Islam. The claims to being about freedom and modernity, rationality and morals, are shown to be propaganda when that collusion of the left and Islam, is found.

Eligibility Lawsuits Update

Wrotnowski Stay Denied

The Social Lamarckians Are Not Extinct

Quoting Ayn Rand: "...the notion that men can be conditioned to communism genetically-- that is, that a few generations conditioned by dictatorship will transmit communist ideology to their descendants, who will be communists at birth." Human identity does not change, though; even Russian, Chinese and several religious, identities persisted through several generations of ruthless communist rule. The point about a Social Lamarckism is that there are still those who believe in the inheritance of acquired characteristics, and that such can be induced politically, so as to equalize various groups, or whatever the purported ideal excusing power of that kind may be.

America's Right Summarizes Today's Four Biggest Eligibility Lawsuits

Four Main Cases, One Tough Road Likewise, from Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Fighting an Uphill Battle in Rollerskates Challenging Obama's Eligibility Only Steps from th...

Other Eligibility Lawsuits Make It To The Top

as this one : Wrotnowski case docketed A summary of the issue is here: Obama and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

SCOTUS Declines To Grant Stay In An Eligibility Case

but others may still get through. Permalink & these decisions Also see this from Dr. Jack Wheeler

The Further Left A Regime Is, The More Strict The Censorship

is found to be under it. From this one knows as well, that reason is not thought to be on the side of moves to the left, even by those running regimes of that kind.

It Seems Unbelievable That The High Court Might Leave Obama Unaccountable

and having to answer to no one, in spite of being required to answer to the Supreme Court, to avoid admission of ineligibility. The rule of law means we don't have anyone who is that unaccountable, therefore the court will have to proceed against him for such defiance.

The Encapsulations Self-Regenerative

a definition of life. Living beings grow and reproduce as individuals, encapsulations one could say, especially relative to activities of the reproductive and self-regenerating kind.

Dec. 5th Supreme Court Conference On Obama's Eligibility

as found here: Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?
Follow the links to explore the major media news blackout on this momentous issue.
also from: Thursday, November 27, 2008
Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
& from Sunday, November 30, 2008
Our Republic Must Be 'A Government Of Laws & Not Of Men'
...while Obama just defying the Supreme Court would mean most fundamental lawlessness relative to our constitutional law. Law, or personalities on a political stage, mindlessly vying for power, those are the alternatives. Personalities being treated as above the law because they have been fetishized by corrupted media, are not compatible with the continuity of the republic as such, as described above. The high court cannot reasonably evade this conflict.
& from Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Obama Allows Ineligibility To Stand Unchallenged
on the level of a Supreme Court proceeding: Solicitor general's office dodges questions about birth certificate complaint-- also see Berg to File Emergency Injunction Today, Awaits Answer from Barack Obama and DNC ...though they have two days for mail delivery (i.e. some time Wednesday) still left to respond, the verdict would appear to be that there has been an admission by default of ineligibility
& from Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Lots Of Information On Eligibility Lawsuits
...at this Permalink

To Fix The 'Credit Jam' Regulators Could Lower The Capital Requirements

but for those banks which increase their volume of lending, and in proportion as they do so. This would bring back home equity lending on a much larger scale, as there would be two ways to compete. One being to be the sounder and more likely to take over other banks, and the other being to increase lending for the consideration, and gain revenue while being under less-strict rules. The risks of inflation and unsoundness are obvious but perhaps not greater than alternatives.

Will The Fed Start Buying State Debt Issues

this is an odd jab at predicting the next move of interventions aimed at getting large sums out where they'll be spent immediately.

American Thinker Runs Two Articles On The Correlation

between the rise of Obama and the declines in market valuations: More
& see also The Obama Market. From October, and, for substantiation of the correlation and the direction of the arrow of causality, see : An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

From Alan Keyes Eligibility Lawsuit

"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,"

Eligibility Lawsuits Find Litigants With Unquestionable Standing

as here. Also, from Friday, November 14, 2008
More On Eligibility Lawsuits
From this link, where quite a few are underway in many states: Obama camp: Lawsuits by citizens are 'garbage'
Added from Tuesday, November 18, 2008
A Commenter Draws Out The Key Issue For The Eligibility Lawsuits
From the comments on the next post down: "Indonesia, at the time Obama lived there and was deemed an Indonesian citizen, did not recognize dual citizenship, and neither did the US recognize dual citizenship with Indonesia."

"Unrepentant Terrorist" Ayers Gets Treated As A Moral Authority...

...by major media, as he pontificates on how there is supposedly no place in American politics for 'guilt by association'. All the while, Obama has been an applicant for the highest security clearance, and by no means to be given a presumption of innocence in that regard. The electorate had only to trust or distrust, not to indict or determine guilt. Therefore the story of 'guilt by association' is not known to be true or reasonable. The granting of moral authority to such as Ayers is in itself an indulgence of gross amoralism, of journalistic nihilism even.

The More You Hate America & Americans, The More You Favor Which Candidate...

for president, and which party? This is an inductive generalization, which you have either observed the underlying facts in support of, or not.

A Learned & Industrious Observer Of Obama Concludes As Follows:

"STANLEY KURTZ: The real Obama — the man beyond the feel-good symbol — is a far-left radical. “What We Know About Obama”"
To repeat and clarify: AS applicant for our top security clearance and the command-in-chief of the armed forces, a candidate for president must get NO presumption of innocence IN THAT REGARD. Addition: " report has come out summarizing everything these people did. You can read it here. The FBI file, some 400 plus pages, is available here." from this piece by Jim Simpson

Applicants For The Highest Security Clearance Must Get No Presumption Of Innocence

Regardless of what is said about 'guilt by association', the voters do not indict or accuse; they trust or distrust one or the other of the two. Each candidate is an applicant for this very high security clearance, and must win trust relative to the other, not just complain about being supposedly being judged guilty, when the electorate does not even accuse, in its capacity as voters. This is why long affinity for far left, subversive, even terroristic types, like Ayers and Dohrn, is an issue that can't go away. The application is for the command-in-chief of the armed forces, a responsibility which the electorate can't help but take seriously.

A Positive Feedback Mechanism With Down & Up Markets

works in favor of Obama and McCain respectively. Markets down, gets poll numbers up for Obama, and that reinforces itself. The reverse process operates for McCain, and can snowball.
Added later: NR mentions "Obama Panic" concept, though not in so many words. McCain Rally, or McCain restores confidence, is closely related to this idea as well. See: “Obama’s Stock”
see also: Obama and the Stock Market and its references, and, for substantiation of the correlation and the direction of the arrow of causality, see : An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

A Left Which Uses Financial Panic-Mongering Should Lose Massively

especially since they would then seem not to care about the collateral damage. Power is much more important to them.
Addition: Dissecting Leftism has information on how dishonest the major polls are from here

Polls Dishonesty Enforcers

"Death Threats Sent to Pollster: After releasing this morning’s numbers showing McCain ahead in Ohio and Florida, the Strategic Vision polling company received several death threats through the contact e-mail on the company’s web site. David Johnson, the CEO of Strategic Vision, shared the messages with National Review Online. One of the messages stated: My goodness, your polls . . . Go"

This Is Why Collaboration With Ayers Is So Bad

Permalink Ayers and his circle believed that tens of millions of Americans would have to be killed

Has Obama Admitted That He Is Not Eligible?

from this: "
A motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and
A motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg’s motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted. " At this Permalink , one finds that already nine lawsuits have been filed to demand eligibility determination
added later: Berg to U.S. Supreme Court this Afternoon

Obama's Excuse-Making For Criminals Echoes Old Bomber Ayers

From this Source:" wrote what the New York Times called a 'rave review' of a book by William Ayers that, among other things, said “he’d like to see the prison system itself essentially demolished,' comparing the American prison system to South Africa’s mass detention of young blacks';
campaigned himself against 'the industrial prison complex';
in 1998 'was one of only three Illinois state senators to vote against a proposal making it a criminal offense for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang';
in support of a bill against racial profiling, argued that statistical disparities in arrests were proof of racism and discrimination by the police. Note that Kurtz’s summary here of Obama’s legislative record in Springfield...[more at the link]
The pattern here is what I call a liking for freedom-FOR-aggression, and a dislike of at least others', freedom-FROM-aggression. Under such a heading, a great variety of votes and positions form up into a coherence of sorts.

Polls Credibility

"The polls usually show the Democrat ahead "Reviewing the polls printed in the New York Times and the Washington Post in the last month of every presidential election since 1976, I found the polls were never wrong in a friendly way to Republicans. When the polls were wrong, which was often, they overestimated support for the Democrat, usually by about 6 to 10 points. "
Added later: Sunday, October 19, 2008

Presidential Race Is Closer Than The Numbers Given In Major Polls
Source tells you how for decades, the polls have consistently overstated democratic support for a presidential candidate, in a uniform one-sided way & the Bradley Effect could be ten points according to analyst cited. The two in this case, may overlap considerably

Great Work From Audacious Epigone

Wednesday, October 15, 2008
An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

The Conditions Of The Last Month Politically & Economically...

have caused a psychological toll on the entire urban world, so I must confess that I have been psychologically affected as well. I am working as usual, but otherwise I must slow down on my internet participation a bit

"The Success Of A Con Man Augments His Panic"

This is quoted from memory from Rand. For each increment that Obama is to the left of what he is pretended to be, he is that much more of a fraud. He is under that much more of a panicky stress. For an admitted dope user, he will be that much more likely to use more and worse dope, for each increment as above.
The deceiver is destroyed by his fears of being found out; he breaks down. He breaks down the faster the further out from truth his deception runs. All of this hugely intensified by the scale of the attention on the one deceiver, who has all the world looking at him, and many may interpret what they see as a dope user.

The Obama Panic Can Be Stopped & Soon...

...if those contacted by pollsters would say they're not voting for Obama. It is the uncertainty spreading through the world, on how far left Obama might actually turn out to be, with a major media chorus later, ferociously supporting moves to nationalize in many directions. A positive feedback mechanism can develop from this, where markets freeze from uncertainty, and are considered too important to be left to flounder on their own. Markets look to the future, and this global panic has to be, by now, in large part, about the scare that Obama, so long willingly subordinate to wild left-wing terrorists, may seize an opportunity for collectivization, if elected. Therefore, this fear can be forestalled, by McCain's support level moving up even or higher. ____________Added Sat. Aft. from NewsBusters.org»
IBD: Market Dive Due to Impending 'First Socialist President,',
the concept of the Obama Panic is being published today to the millions. especially to be noted is the insistence that the markets look ahead, so it is about Obama, not Bush or anyone building up to this point from the past. The markets are not blaming, but projecting months or more out.
As I may have been first to publish on: Tuesday, October 7, 2008" The Obama Panic Is On
or, if not, why don't investors feel confident when polls are suggesting an Obama win? If a move to the left, or towards the Hope for Change, will not be bad for America and for the investors therein, shouldn't markets be soaring on that Hope for Change (AKA Obama leftism and smash that old devil Wall Street). "
...& on Friday, October 10, 2008 I posted another one on how
The Obama Panic Is On: Money Talks In Its Own Language & CEO's Say It In English...
"...74 percent of the executives say they fear that an Obama presidency would be disastrous for the country, while only 19 percent fear a McCain presidency." Survey: CEOs Say Obama Would Be Disastrous Each of these corroborates the other; one can't easily lie, the other is unlikely to...

Obama Tries To Cover Over With Soil His ACORN Base Of Supporters

Obama Campaign Caught in ACORN Lies, to hide this support base, is much as admitting that their reputation is horrific & see: Barack Obama lied about ACORN involvement (he was a trainer).

Are There Some Enemies Of America Who Don't Want Obama In &...

Question: Does Barack Obama Have Any Friends Who AREN'T Communists?- which is a good summary of how far left and wild Obama's affinities are. Slowly, the people have been finding this out. The last piece of the puzzle to go into place, is the recognition that markets look a little ahead, and seeing Obama ahead, they panic everywhere. The Obama panic is on. If it were a McCain one, looking backwards at Bush, then days when McCain was close to being ahead, would be the times of the huge sell-offs. It's the other way though: Obama up, markets down, way, way down.
Thursday, October 9, 2008

Damning USSR Document Which Should Preclude Biden From High Security Clearance
...such as the electorate is responsible to give or withhold. Shocking revelations about Biden in Soviet-era documents

The Obama Panic Reveals 5 (?) MILLION Mortgages To Illegals

Presumably all of these used fake ID's- number is attributed to the US HUD agency at this link
As bad as this sounds, it does suggest a way to ameliorate the subprime problem: Selectively deport those who are behind on payments. The remainder will rush to pay, even though their future credit rating means nothing to them, when using fake ID such as the matricula consular.
A most urgent inquiry for government and the right to undertake is this: Is there a pro-Obama Financial Jihad underway, and is Mexico chiming in with that, encouraging its illegals here to stop paying mortgages? In this connection consider that the sheriff of Cook County, (Chicago) is attempting a moratorium on foreclosures, which is subversive in much the same way. If there are actually attacks from so many directions at once, Bush may have to have a go at Iran now, flush these subverters out and down.
Update: KFYI's follow-up: http://kfyi.com/pages/local_news.html?feed=118695&article=4381201

Conclusive Documentary Proof Of The Far Left Political Identity Of BHO

Archives prove Obama was a New [*] Party member =dispositive as to unfitness for the command-in-chief of our forces and the highest security clearance which the voters can give...
__________*"The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of 'fusion' failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling. But dissolving the party didn't stop the membership, including Barack Obama, from continuing..."
quoted from this Source

The Command-In-Chief Of The Armed Forces Of the U.S.A. To One With These Associations (RNC-detailed)...

Relationship called 'much more extensive' than senator is willing to admit--Republican National Committee
This is the word from the top of the moderate right political structure; no jokes, no smears, just the devastating associations, which I say are disqualifying for the command-in-chief of our armed forces. Added Thursday: Murtaugh to continue focus on Ayers, and they're drawing the connection to qualifications for the command-in-chief of the armed forces, as is crucial. Obama is an applicant for that, not one entitled to a presumption of innocence from 'guilt by association'. He must win our trust, not pretend that it is just owed to him.

Progressives Try To Rescue Obama From The Shadow Of Bomber Ayers With Specious Analogies

Marc Cooper/Huffington Post pretends Obama/Ayers similar to McCain/David Ifshin
my comment is at the link

Obama & The Left Know Where Their Weakest Point Is, & Are Willing To Ditch All Pretended Principles...

such as freedom of political publication, to cover up their most vulnerable spot.
--------------"When an outside group ran TV ads pointing out links between Obama and the former Weatherman terrorist Bill Ayers, the Obama campaign asked the Bush Justice Department — yes, that Bush Justice Department, the [supposed] fount of all evil — to open a criminal investigation."
Quoted from Rich Lowry of NR here: “Free Speech...” (Also see: this report which tells of the Justice department leftists who will be involved in the sending of election observers, who are illicit contributors to Obama, apparently unafraid of the administration becoming wakeful on this )
Being a trusted colleague and collaborator of terrorists, means being unable to win the trust of the voters who know of this disqualification for the command-in-chief of the armed forces. There may be a 'now or never' feeling on the left, as they appear to be willing to use a scorched-earth policy relative to the reputation of the major media outlets, as if believing that other outlets may henceforth come to political dominance. If so, it is that much more important to cause them to lose this time, because of the danger that they would be tempted to extreme measures, to avoid losing influence such as they have now through big media.
_______________________..."Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, who is close to both men, describe[s] them as 'friends?'
'They're friends,' he said. 'So what?'
Two questions: Shouldn't Mayor Daley's comments be included in articles assessing the relationship between Ayers and Obama? Are 'friends' different than 'pals'?"
Quoted from: Stephen F. Hayes at this Permalink

To Be A Trusted Colleague Of Known Terrorists, As Obama...

has long been, to Ayers and Dohrn, is to destroy the chance of being trusted by the informed and loyal electorate, with the command-in-chief of our armed forces. As a trusted leader of terrorist-allied Rathke's ACORN activities, Obama also must forfeit that same trust of the electorate as above. At this link, one may find others which indicate hitherto unheralded depth to the collegiality and collaborations of Obama: Ruh-Roh... Palin Tells Crowd Obama Is "Palling Around" With Terrorists, i.e. with weathermen Ayers and Dohrn. Trust is earned, not given, especially in the case of our very highest security clearance, which is yet decided by the electorate.
________________ "...the Joyce Foundation, and especially Ms. Leff, had a longstanding and ongoing relationship with Bill Ayers, whom Ms. Leff considered to be in charge of developing the Chicago Annenberg Challenge."
Quoted from this Source, where further substantiation as to the above is to be found
as also here: William Ayers and Barack Obama: Finally exposed
& here: Exclusive: Joseph Farah spotlights history behind Obama's ties to 3 domestic terrorists"

The Iron-Bound Racial Character Of The Obama Candidacy

...is known especially by the way it is pretended that he is moderate, centrist, bipartisan, post-partisan and a unifier. Actually he is the leftmost senator, voting even leftwards of the one SOCIALIST, and more consistently with his party. If Obama is nevertheless presented as a centrist like McCain, i.e. on net balance, regarding issues, that leaves only the prospective racial changeover as the hoped-for and waited-for Change. Racial change, as a value-in-itself, is change we don't need.

Subprime Skullduggery, Or The Selfless Civil Servant As Financial Terrorist

and the bombthrowers are doing their Weathermen-like job on Wall Street. All of this favors the election of the leftmost senator, and a lurch to the left such as would increase the power of many an official, which would be quite convenient for them.
"Note that by requiring the use of the mark to market rule, the government that required that subprime loans be made, is now requiring that they be written down to near zero values that Secretary [Paulson] is advising the Congress are much less than their real worth. After all, his argument in selling his plan to the Congress is that the government can hold the loans for a short while and then sell them into the market for large profits. But, unless and until the mark to market rule is rescinded, The government will be able to sell subprime loans only to nonpublicly traded companies. So, to unload these loans for the promised profits, the mark to market rule will [be] rescinded when it is in the interests of our government to do so. In essence, the U. S. Government has required banks and other mortgage lenders to make imprudent subprime loans and, under Paulson's plan, gets to steal them and later sell them for a profit. This is not a bailout. It is highway robbery."
quoted from here: #

If You Like Some Terrorists, & They Like You, Does That Mean You Are Terrorist-Friendly?

"Weathermen terrorists declare support for Obama
Call for 'grassroots effort' to help boost campaign [...] …Exclusive: Joseph Farah spotlights history behind Obama's ties to 3 domestic terrorists"
Plus, a little off-topic: David Bernstein, says a most uncommon special dispensation appears to have been offered to Obama for a position at the University of Chicago, tenure upon hiring without having published even one scholarly article, at a school with the strictest standards until then at least.
Back on to Obama's mutual favor with terrorists and such:
If financial terrorists were active on a large scale just now, whom would they favor?

More Openness To Diversity Yields More Amoral Familism

...since the world is populated overwhelmingly with such family traditions. The more such families you admit, the less the prospects for even marginal attenuation stateside, of the world's near-consensus AGAINST treating strangers fairly, as if they were relatives ( i.e. extended-family ones)."Mass immigration has introduced alien ethnic cronyism on a vast scale into America, as any student not only of today’s deluge but also of the Great Wave well knows. The whole point of amoral familism is that among many of the world’s ethnic groups honesty to those with whom one does not have close kinship ties is not normal and accepted behavior."
from: Amoral Familism And Baby Formula
...perhaps totally unrelated:
"A READER AT A MAJOR NEWSROOM EMAILS: Off the record, every suspicion you have about MSM being in the tank for O is true. We have a team of 4 people going thru dumpsters in Alaska and 4 in arizona. Not a single one looking into Acorn, Ayers or Freddiemae. Editor refuses to publish anything that would jeopardize election for O, and betting you dollars to donuts same is true at NYT, others. People cheer when CNN or NBC run another Palin-mocking but raising any reasonable inquiry into obama is derided or flat out ignored. "

The Media Unaccountability Of Obama Shows That Worse Must Be Expected If He Won

If the major media now refuse to hold Obama accountable for his positions, but cover for him, much as if they were his campaign spokesmen, doesn't it have to be much worse if a sitting president, with all the power of that office, held that racial privilege of media unaccountability? May the electorate reasonably trust major media, officialdom or academia to hold this racial candidate accountable if he became president? They won't do it now, and he has no effective way to get back at them for violating any such omerta, with his current position. One still has to go to the internet or the far right publications to get this most basic and necessary information for voting as a responsible citizen:
________"...Obama voted with his party 96 percent of the time. In the prior two years, his number was 95 percent, making him the fourth most partisan member of the Senate. And not just partisan, but also highly ideological. In 2007, according to the National Journal, Obama's voting record made him 'the most liberal Senator.' Throughout his Senate career, according to Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), the dean of liberal advocacy groups, Obama voted 'right' 90 percent of the time. Actually this is misleading, since ADA counts an absence as if it were a vote on the 'wrong' side. If we discount his absences, Obama voted to ADA's approval more than 98 percent of the time."
...quoted from Joshua Muravchik at (an online-only contribution to) Commentary found via VFR
The worse someone is, the more he gets out of a refusal to bring up negatives. It's hard to think of a more anti-moral proceeding, than one which rewards the bad in proportion as they are bad, and power-greedy. When the very intelligent, worldly, knowledgeable and socially accomplished do precisely the above-criticized operations, isn't it likely to be deliberate and aimed at aggrandizing power? There's little chance of a mistake, other than a typical one of over-ambition, which is an occupational hazard, so to speak, of their avocation to power.

Aggressive Intolerance From The Quota-Placeholder

As quoted from this and the following links:
"Does Barack Obama support the First Amendment? (answer: well, it depends)
Is Barack Obama a strong proponent of the First Amendment? Does he support free speech, even by those who strongly disagree with him? The answer is: not really.
I'll keep track in reverse chronological order:
* Public officials in St. Louis/Missouri threaten Obama opponents with criminal libel? (apparently under the direction of or with the input of the BHO campaign)
* Barack Obama threatens licenses of stations running NRA ad (National Rifle Association)
* Obama quote: '[immigrants and illegal aliens are] counting on us to stop the hateful rhetoric filling our airwaves – rhetoric that poisons our political discourse, degrades our democracy, and has no place in this great nation.' That's a reference to commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Lou Dobbs, two people that Obama has not only smeared but lied about. Clearly, he doesn't just disagree with them, he doesn't want them to have the right to speak."
Politics being the ethics of aggression, there is only one consideration, which party tries to expand the scope of aggression more than the other? If one is to assign rank to different kinds of aggression in our polity, rating one sort more dangerous than another, threats to political speech being more aggressive on one side than another, may be dispositive. Not only does Obama show up as the lowly one on this consideration, but he effectively acknowledges his weakness relative to the truth coming out, for the mass audience, on his actual inclination and associations. As applicants for the highest security clearance, to be given by the electorate, all questionable associations must be brought up for public questioning.
Added from Thursday, October 2, 2008

A Major Move To The Left Needs Enforcement Of News Blackouts...
... in major media through state intimidation. If not so, why would this be attempted:
“Obama’s Assault on the First Amendment”
"Item: Both Obama and his running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, have indicated that an Obama administration would use its control of the Justice Department to prosecute its political opponents... [...]
Item: There is a troubling report that the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Section, top officials of which are Obama contributors, has suggested criminal prosecutions against those they anticipate will engage in voter 'intimidation' or 'oppression' in an election involving a black candidate"
An indication is to be seen here as well, that the anti-volitionist, materialistic left, greatly outdoes the spiritual, volitionistic right, in bold aggression against freedom of political speech and publication. If the left cannot behave even in this one area, where they should have some credibility on a par with the larger right-wing, they deserve no chance at power, as may be given by the electorate.Those who rose by one unearned special dispensation after another, have the least respect for other's rights. It's the effrontery of the protected classes, moving on toward change we don't need.

Politics Being The Ethics Of Aggression, It All Comes Down To Who Stands For More Aggression...

..to be visited on those within the jurisdiction for which the decision (of the electorate) is to be made. No other consideration is relevant in comparison to this, as the politics can only reasonably be distinguished from the non-political realm, by reference to whether it falls under the heading of ethics of aggression, or not.
From the Augusta Chronicle:
"Mr. Obama was the only member of the state Senate to vote against a bill to prohibit the early release of convicted criminal sexual abusers; and was among only four who voted against bills to toughen criminal sentences, increase penalties for criminals whose offenses were committed in the furtherance of gang activities..."
From GC of GNXP : " Obama is beloved by both Yale *and* Jail, and is an apologist for criminal vermin like the Jena Six. "
Supporting link for the above: Krissah Williams Thompson reports on the push to register felons to vote for Obama. Is there a reasonable expectation, other than operator error, in which such felons are registered, and would vote other than for Obama? If not, that tells us quite a lot in itself.
The following quotes are from Corsi's bestselling exposé and are adduced as unchallenged by Obama:
"Obama was deeply influenced by Frantz Fanon..." [JB characterization of Fanon: poster boy of anti-caucasianism for the academic left, known for advocating violent aggression against whites as liberating for blacks]
"Odinga supporters expressed their anger at losing the December 2007 election by engaging in a wave of tribal and religious violence in which machete-wielding Luo mobs killed 1,000 people and displaced approximately 350,000 more. [pages 103-107]
The post-election violence included massacres of Christians in which Luo mob supporters of Odinga damaged more than 300 churches, including burning to death 50 people who sought refuge in a Christian church in the town of Eldoret. [page 104]"
This is the same Odinga who was supported by Obama, and who through U.S. intervention has now acquired a top position in the Kenyan government. Obama's loyalties are to the subhuman aggressor, and America will not accept that.

Speaking The Unspeakable: Subprime Debacle Has A Lot To Do With Pro-Diversity Re:Illegals

On VFR where the following is posted :
"A. Zarkov writes:
To understand the roots of our current financial crisis, one cannot ignore how the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) got the ball rolling. There is tremendous resistance to this story because of its racial aspects, but a few brave souls have dared. Stan Leibowitz was one of the first with his New York Post essay last February called 'The Real Scandal.' It's all very simple. You can't have a sub-prime loan problem if there are no sub-prime loans, and those loans could not exist without lax underwriting standards. To understand the mentality behind reduced underwriting standards one simply has to browse the handbook published by the Fannie Mae Foundation (yes that Fannie Mae) called "Reaching the Immigrant Market: Creating Home Ownership Opportunities for New Americans." Here you can see first hand the bizarre thinking that led to loaning people large sums of money they couldn't ever repay. For example, the handbook authors write about 'barriers to immigrant homeownership.' What are the barriers? Once you decode the Orwellian language, the barriers are obvious: 1. Lack of a verifiable income; 2. Lack of a credit history that demonstrates the will and ability to repay loans; 3. Lack of ability to speak and read English, the language loan contracts are written in; 4. Lack of a valid Social Security Number; 5. Inability to make down payments and closing costs. The handbook advises financial institutions on how to reach the immigrant market by using "nontraditional" measures of immigrant creditworthiness. Translation: no creditworthiness. You can find the whole prescription for lax underwriting in Chapter 6. Here they are. Again I decode the Newspeak:
1.Latitude in proving legal residence--give mortgages to illegal aliens
2. Low down payment--no down payment.
3. Higher qualifying ratios--ignore the fact that the borrower will spend most of his income on mortgage payments.
4. Alternative and nontraditional credit--ignore the borrower's dismal credit score if he even has one. Substitute meaningless or easily faked documents.
5. Waive the mortgage insurance requirement (page 55)--the killer item! As the handbook explains, this give the lender the ultimate say in the underwriting decision because the mortgage insurance company is out of the loop. This important safeguard is gutted. Is it any wonder you get a worthless loan? Americans are forced to pay for mortgage insurance, but illegal Mexicans aren't. [...] Chapter six also provides the names of various special loan programs for aliens. We have the Wells Fargo Community Homeownership Program--no mortgage insurance. How about the National of La Raza Home to Own Program. The table on page 58 gives others.
It's now obvious how approximately half a trillion dollars in bad loans got created. It started with blacks and the CRA, [...] the hordes of illegal aliens that had spread throughout the U.S. Financial engineering gave them the means to sell off this toxic junk and make money on the loan origination fees. Then you wrap the whole thing in a racism-xenophobia security blanket to immunize it against criticism.
Now the federal government proposes to buy all these bad loans and charge it off to the taxpayer! Once the feds own the homes, will they simply let the borrowers live in them indefinitely? A gift to Mexicans courtesy of the U.S. taxpayer.
You can read the Leibowitz article here.
You can download the Fannie Mae Foundation handbook here. I encourage everyone to download (before this embarrassing document disappears) and at least browse the handbook. "
It is also at least somewhat misleading to describe this extended bad-mortgage slump, which has years behind it and ahead of it, as a crisis. There is a series of crises for the firms, as they get taken out one by one, each on its own day of 'crisis'; but the overall slumping pattern is a slow-motion wave of defaults caused by valuing openness to diversity of ever-lower and more fraudulent credit extensions. The non-diverse have to pay mortgage insurance, the diversity doesn't. Often they need not give valid ID to obtain hundreds of thousands in mortgage credit to buy, or squat in, a property. That problem remains unsolved, and to solve it requires restricting eligibility for mortgages, at the same time that the public desire is to get a larger share of the population into mortgages. The only way to do that now is to recruit teenagers into mortgages, as was done in Oklahoma in the heyday of the Penn Square beer-out-of-a-boot bankers. Beyond that market would be negative down payments.
Added 9-26-08 from Saturday, September 20, 2008

Forcing Openness To Diversity Can Bring Down The High & Mighty
As this quote explains:"Freddie Mac warned of the logical pitfalls of pursuing loans on the basis of skin color and not credit history.The Washington Post reported that the company conducted a study in which it was found that far more black people have bad credit than white people, even when both have the same incomes. In fact, the study showed a higher percentage of African Americans with incomes of $65,000 to $75,000 had bad credit than white Americans with incomes of below $25,000.Such data demonstrated that when federal regulators demanded parity between racial groups in lending, the only way to achieve a quota would be to begin making intentionally bad lending decisions.The study, however, came under brutal attack in the U.S. Congress and was ridiculed with charges of racism."This quotation was found on VFR, where one may find MORE…Sailer's article on The Diversity Recession gives indispensable background: … [Read More]Oddly enough, here one finds that following the money trail, leads on toward losses, even the bankruptcy of some of the most elite firms. One does find, though, that the basic elements associated with contemporary (race-exploiting) power-greed are very much to the forefront.Politicians bully the money-men, crying racism, and those power-seekers gain power, even rising from obscurity like Obama, to the Democratic presidential nomination.The smearing approach is conspicuously used, where opponents are expected to prove that they have motivations other than racial hatred against disadvantaged minorities. The only answer to this, is to keep pointing out that there is no rational argument for officials to have more power to racially redistribute or any domestic reason, that is why they have only the smearing approach of: prove you're not racist, or give us what we want. The issues are chosen so as to facilitate such an approach, and even when they'rre not deliberately so chosen, an effect like natural selection occurs, such that headway is made when the issue and the method are related as above.If valuing openness to diversity created value all by itself, these officials would not have been able to bankrupt or force the mergers of eminent financial institutions. Heads they win power, tails you lose money and freedom-from-aggression. It's a ratchet, and it's a racket, and it's non-profit, but highly favorable to the accumulation of power.At or under this link or search term---YouTube - Explosive Video, Fannie Mae CEO calling Obama and the ... Dems the "Family" and "Conscience" of Fannie Mae---may be found on Youtube a reference for that claim as to Obama being drawn up on the vortex of politically extracting minority mortgages. This was filched from the formidable GC of GNXP.And for those who delight in following the Benjamins, here's a blaze on one relevant trail of bright breadcrumbs...[FROM]...Bear Stearns... Fannie M... Freddie M... Lehman ... AIG
[To] McCain- $88,050... $6,550... $9,100... $117,500... $36,875
[To] Obama- $570,614... $137,950... $68,750... $370,524... $75,899[paraphrased from this Permalink of Pamela Geller's]
Added 9-26-08 from: Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Has the Anti-Discrimination Society Hit Its Final Brick Wall On Wall Street...
or will the patchings hold well enough to let business go back to politics as usual? One point to notice is that the society that prides itself on its enforcement of anti-discrimination, has no possibilities other than to go a-begging, to those that do not pretend to believe in the equality and brotherhood of all mankind, much less try to force such notions on the unwilling by state aggression. Maybe it's not this bad, but what if it is: Anti-discrimination and beggary! Not only is trying to turn us into the U.S. of anti-caucasianism immoral, it is starting to show its long-term impracticality as well.Some more flabbergasting aspects of the subprime fallout are in this article

Does Islam In America Know On Which Side Its Bread Is Served?

Quoting from where one may find: More
"Muslim Arab-Americans favor Obama 84-4.
Obama is doing better among Muslim Arab-Americans than he is among African Americans."
Recall also that this demographic is largely foreign-born, better-educated than the average, cosmopolitan and far above the average level found in their source countries, while travelling often in elite circles hereabouts. In spite of advantages, especially regarding education, this Islamic demographic is indicating political preferences which would be difficult to match outside of a wild and depraved public housing project. These are the prospects for assimilation, beware!
Added from : Sunday, September 21, 2008

Obama May Be Only Good At Making Submissive Gestures Towards Islam
It could be that he has just been carried along on everything else where he would otherwise need to be far above middle ranges. That would have happened so as to have a black who is on the far left, yet who style-wise, travels below the radar which is tripped by obvious anger and hate. The Islamic enthusiasm for him might have been elicited by a feeling that he is willing to be a dhimmi to them. A further speculation along these lines: with several venerable Jewish firms having been brought down recently, shouldn't the government be investigating whether this is terrorism and meddling aimed at securing the presidency for the Islamic preference? If there are indications of this, the government must tell us now, rather than later as the Spanish reluctantly did several years ago, thus ensuring Zapatero's Socialist victory. Bush probably can't keep his eye on the ball, though, as the Feds are going after a Christian compound in Arkansas today, while allowing Acorn to run wild with impunity. This is what the government would do if Bush were in a coma, and letting it run itself.

America's First Racial Election For The Presidency As Declared By Biden

Obama's racial identity: "That will be a transformative event in American politics and internationally," Biden said. "That all by itself will be significant." The quote from Biden is to be found here: Biden: Elect Obama because He’s Black
Most important is to point out that there is no reasonable argument for a move to the left, and the power that undeserving officials get from that leftward move. If there were, it would be used, and not the smearing suggestion that the only impulse behind a vote against the black candidate is racial hatred.
It is really major media, officialdom and its professoriate which by now, should have to prove that they are not motivated entirely by racial hatred-against the majority-that is. The power-greedy have nothing to offer rationally; only illegitimate manipulations are possible for them. Officials have too much, not too little, power. They are not known to have too little power, that's what it's all about.
Added 9-26-08 from : Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Don't You Snitch On Obama!
It's 'smearing' if you do mention before the public, that Obama has far-left connections, has voted leftwards even of the only socialist senator, and can quite sensibly be described as terrorist-friendly. Isn't it interesting that 'smearing' is redefined to occupy the place where one would expect the term 'snitching' to be used? Maybe it will be noticed that those who react more against national-political snitching, than against that which is snitched on, are implacable left-supporters regardless. That is part of what it means to be on the left: You don't snitch on those who facilitate power-greed, at least the anti-volitionist, anti-hereditarian kind of power-seeking.Permalink :Obama FINALLY Admits Communist Connection-----------"The Mainstream media has been attacking Jerome Corsi’s book, The Obama Nation at every opportunity possible. I wonder if any of them actually tried to investigate any of the facts. Doubtful. But here is a fact Senator Obama confirms. In the midst of his massive rebuttal to the book, Senator Obama ADMITS his close relationship with Frank Marshall Davis. Of course, he doesn't mention the part about Davis being a bigshot in the Communist Party of the US..."Obama's murky past: "While the New York Times crack investigative staff is busily pursuing a 4-H pal of Sarah Palin's, they seem to have missed the biggest story of this election cycle. Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn are unrepentent terrorists who even today advocate communism and the overthrow of the United States government. They launched and orchestrated Barack Obama's career, providing him with the qualifications necessary to run for major political office. Repeat: communists and terrorists launched Obama's career. And the fossils at the Times, who are rapidly sinking into financial quicksand, can't bother to report the story."What if in 1960, several books on Kennedy connections to fascism and mafia activities a decade or two earlier, had been published? Something like that hypothetical is happening to Obama now, and it's many times more significant than the 'swiftboating' of Kerry, which mainly exposed fish story-type lies and embellishments

The Electorate Is Presumed Guilty Until Momentarily Proven Innocent

while Obama is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, even though he is an applicant for the very highest security clearance, that is issued by the electorate. If this doesn't exemplify official anti-caucasianism, to be such a widespread assumption in the media and beyond, what would?
Added from Tuesday, September 16, 2008

The Presumption Of Innocence For Terrorists & Terrorist-Friendly Obama, While Guilt Is To Be Presumed Of The Electorate?
09/14/08 - The Fulford File: Guilty As Hell, Free As A Bird—Ayers, Obama, And The Exclusionary Rule, by James Fulford
Reading the above, one can hardly escape the conclusion that Obama regards Ayers as two different moral beings, at least rhetorically. One Ayers ran wild in the 1960's; the other Ayers is entitled to a presumption of innocence, whether charged anew or not. The new Ayers is "establishment" and "respectable". Such a treatment is grossly, nihilistically subversive of morality, and this has to be pointed out again and again, but, most of all it shows that Obama is terrorist-friendly. The electorate, unlike Dohrn, for example, has never, and will never, be charged with, and put on trial for, any crime whatsoever. Somehow, though, this vast electorate, or at least the majority of it, gets presumed guilty of rejecting the world-historical Obam-enon, solely from racial hatred such as would be on a slippery-slope to mass-murder, presumably. Ayers gets away with murder, gets called "respectable" by Obama, while the electorate is somehow obliged to prove itself innocent of any and every racialized accusation by voting for black-as-black. Only government schools could get such a procedure regarded as justice and not monstrous injustice.

De Carvalho On The Psychological Warfare For Obama

The American Lula________________"Obama’s campaign is a work of precision psychological engineering, planned not to win over voters through rational persuasion, but to weaken, shock, and stupefy them to the point of making them accept every loss, every humiliation, every defeat, just in order not to contradict the assumed moral obligation to elect him, it being of little importance whether he actually is an enemy in disguise. Here is what Obama is demanding—and obtaining—from voters: that they sacrifice everything to a fetish, that they do so to some extent consciously, sharing therefore the blame..."
In that sense, the media (and power-grubbing academic) blitz for the racial candidacy, is indeed all about you, but not so much about Obama.
Can Americans be made to feel, by suggestion and subtle gesture and indirection, OBLIGED to grant amoral exemption to the black-qua-black?
If De Carvalho and the polls are even close to being right, it looks black as death for civilization, that there is not already a landslide a-building against Obama, the receptacle of racial, unspeakably deceitful and misbegotten "atonement".

9-11 Remembered & Forgotten: The Disaster Of Valuing Openness To Diversity

all the way down, to the foundations of 100-storey buildings, crushed by immigrants. No one else is going to mention this; that these buildings were brought low, and the national military headquarters itself successfully attacked, by immigrants. All were foreign-born; all fully intended to die on this side of the borders, without ever crossing them again. Thousands died because it suited the powerful to insist, that all man are brothers and such that there can be no lasting enemies, that all are equal and discrimination against those who appear unequal is all that one may legitimately discriminate against, that freedom-for-aggression is desirable, but real freedom is not, and that openness to diversity from civilization is valuable, and more and more of such openness, is more and more value. It still looks as though the first line of defense protecting the Capitol and the White House, was the courage, intelligence and initiative of the passengers, amazingly different from our leaders of anti-discrimination, who, even SEVEN YEARS later, have yet to move strongly against the large-scale immigration of Islamic hostiles.

Why Do The Ambitious Hate Small-Town America

This effect is showing up prominently today especially regarding Palin. It is not so much a question of looking down on others, but of outright hatred; one without sympathy, but that wishes destruction on its objects.
It is vicious, unprovoked hatred, resembling only that which an adult male feels towards his benefactor who saved him. The ambitious of the large cities, whether it is ambition for power or for money or for opportunity for some rarefied urban career specialization, have repeatedly had to be saved politically by the less ambitious out towards the country.
They, the ambitious, have had to be saved from the consequences of their own politics, in which the ambitions of one sort are treated as dovetailing with the evil ambition, which is to say: Power-greed.
They have had to be just saved, over and over, as if they were hopelessly incompetent and grossly inferior, non-viable life-forms. The awareness of this relation, stings them so long and intensely, that they can only react with hatred towards their benefactors, out in the smaller places.
A prime recent example is the differential support for the EU referendum on the Lisbon treaty in the Irish voting. The ambitious, more educated and metropolitan, were down on all fours licking the boots of the power-greedy EU monstrosity. The less-ambitious, less-specialized, more small-town-living part of the electorate, had to save the more ambitious from the consequences of their own alliance with power-greed.
Doesn't it go without saying that the benefactors will be hated for this. Now we have the same situation with Palin, as representing small-town America and such, and drawing the hatred which calls her part of a trailer park element. At this link: More is to be found that is peculiarly candid:
________"She added nothing to the ticket that the Republicans didn't already have sewn up, the white trash vote, the demographic that sullies America's name..."
The hatred is obvious, and clearly different from just feeling superior, as can be determined by reflecting that disadvantaged minorities would never be described by such a writer as that demographic which "sullies America's name". Those minorities, no matter how outrageously low their common standards of behavior, even compared to what the hate-filled, left-friendly find gratifying to refer to as 'white trash', would not be so described, not by the power-greedy at least. Combine these elements and a clear pattern shows: The power-greedy hate those who constrain their efforts to get a bigger, more powerful bureaucracy, and one with power to share out with the ambitious of the above type.

A Glimpse Of The Pro-Diversity Future As the Diversity Managers Dream It

...with the two Asian senators at the spearpoint of this bold thrust at our sovereignty i.e.
a racial government for Hawaii with features building towards secession:
___ "If the Senate overrides the veto, it will speed the country’s embrace of a form of post-nationalism (already held by many elites) — a confederation of various races, ethnicities and interest groups competing for special privileges, exemptions and recognition.
The Akaka Bill creates a race-based government for native Hawaiians. Even its supporters don’t deny that the bill could lead to outright secession. In the meantime, the bill will produce a regime of racial preferences, reparations, and lawsuits fueled by ethnic grievance, victimhood, and entitlement...."
...as found in More Race Politics From the Un-Post-Racial Candidate
The broken pediment, or was he the Natural Bridge of Hybrid Vigor, is all for this split-off.
All three mixed-race senators are enthused over this fissuring along strictly racial lines. Two out of three of them are spearheading it with the Akaka bill. This points to what the power-greedy perhaps don't want anyone but themselves to observe; the mixed-race are not natural bridges but natural dividers. If so, why is this? At the frontiers we find the most warlike, and their increase is assisted by those further off the frontiers of conflict, so that those who can effectively stimulate that assistance through carefully managing frontier conflict to their advantage, increase numbers and their practices relative to those who are less able to manage this feat.
This is what valuing openness to diversity means in practice; valuing division and conflict and the power that grows from being the arbiter, and ever more arbitrary, ruler of the intensified conflicts and divisions. Competition for power is not always zero-sum. Forty dictatorships hacked from one republic offer hugely more power for those who ride Diversity to the top of the devolutionary racial sovereignties, although the nukes presumably would stay with the big remainder, and thus the international power need not atrophy that much. The wars that get us to the devolutions allow for essentially unlimited power Re: the citizenry. Even if every catalyzed conflict fizzles, there is still great increase of power to be won for each step towards the ultimate divisions.

When 'The Diversity' Means The Quota-Eligible...

valuing openness to diversity will mean also valuing the increase of quota recruitment.
More quota recruitment means also further randomization of the information contained in merit recruitment; therefore it is anti-merit. Pro-diversity is anti-merit, and valuing openness to diversity is a way of being pro-diversity. Each additional cohort pushes towards anti-merit society, but valuing openness to 'diversity' as above has no inherent limit values or thresholds, and would be even completely contradicted by the imposition of them. Therefore, necessarily, valuing openness to Diversity makes anti-merit society the ideal. Politically, diversity does mean quota-eligibles; the mention of broader diversity as of species and genetic mutations, ideas and cultures which are not needy, is only by way of analogy, used in support of pro-diversity as being for quota-eligibles.

Those Who Want Freedom-FOR-Aggression Favor Obama

and they have every reason to. Obama is a standout for taking the side of aggressors, possibly unrivalled in the legislatures he has so far been in. Although such a pattern is common among black racial activists, somehow Obama managed to outdo his colleagues among legislators. This could explain a large part of his appeal to the left, in that wanting freedom-for-aggression, and hating freedom-FROM-aggression, is at least a large part of what it means to be on the left.
The following quote from the Augusta Chronicle illustrates how far out in left field Obama is on this question of whether some must have freedom-FOR-aggression.
"- Obama was the only senator not to support a bill 'to report suspected child abuse while protecting the identity of the facility or person providing the information.' The bill passed 54-0-1 -- the one being Obama, who voted "present." It passed the Illinois House 117-0.
- Obama voted present 'on a bill in committee requiring criminals to serve consecutive sentences for separate crimes involving convictions for severe bodily harm or sexual assault, but didn't vote at all when the measure came to the floor.' The bill passed the Senate 54-0 and the House 118-0.
- Obama voted present on a bill 'making it harder for abusive and neglectful parents to regain custody of their children.' The Senate vote was 57-0-1, with the lone wolf being Obama.
- Obama skipped a vote on a bill 'to prohibit convicted sex offenders from serving on school boards.' It passed without him, 58-0 in the Senate and 106-0 in the House.
Adds the Times : 'The records also show Mr. Obama voted 'no' on a bill allowing police officers to execute warrants and enter buildings without knocking if there was a reasonable belief a weapon would be used against them; voted 'present' on legislation requiring that minors who commit gun crimes on or near a school be prosecuted as adults; and did not vote on a bill requiring fingerprint background checks on school bus drivers.
'Mr. Obama was the only member of the state Senate to vote against a bill to prohibit the early release of convicted criminal sexual abusers; and was among only four who voted against bills to toughen criminal sentences, increase penalties for criminals whose offenses were committed in the furtherance of gang activities..."
Power-greed, malice and the liking of freedom-FOR-aggression go together. Obama managed to stand out even from hardened black racial activists in the Illinois legislature, for taking the side of aggressors. He went the extra mile for them and then some; therefore he is an enemy of our freedom-FROM-aggression, and of all true freedom.

The Audacity Of Attempted Censorship Of Political Publication

"Obama isn't just ignoring or running from his past. He's actively trying to cover over it: His campaign has threatened TV stations with their broadcast licenses for running ads noting Obama's link to Ayers." quoted from this link to the Augusta Chronicle
as found via this one: Annenberg, Ayers And Obama In The Weekend News
which also quotes the (Minnesota) Post-Bulletin as follows: "Imagine if John McCain had a similar relationship with a right-wing militia leader who had bombed a federal building."

If A Presidential Candidate's Hero Was A Pimp Named Detroit Red...

later called Malcolm X, how Obamanable is the electorate which could vote for him?
Obama claims the pimp Malcolm X as a hero in one of his autobiographies. As found through this Parapundit Entry Permalink, Sailer says: "Obama wrote that the hero of his youth was Malcolm X." Speaking of obamanation, Jerome Corsi's book Obama Nation also picks out the pimp M.X. as a hero for Obama, analyzing those autobiographies of his. The effrontery of self-importance, of someone who could look UP to a pimp, yet consider himself good enough to hold high office, is very hard to surpass. What if McCain had been shown to have had Charles Manson as his hero or role model, is there any chance any major media outlet could lay off that information? Of course not, and that demonstrates the depraved double standard which is working in favor of the black because he's black, and left-wing enough to excite the interest of the power-greedy.
Added from: Monday, August 25, 2008

Big Media Dem'monolith, Terrorist-Friendly Keynoter & Pro-Diversity As Disease Vector Again
1-Behold the monolith: From Dissecting Leftism of Monday, August 25, 2008"* ABC News - (99% to democrats) [...] * CBS News - (99% to democrats) " More here
2- Ingrid Mattson: THE DNC INVITES TERROR SYMPATHIZER, JIHAD APOLOGIST MUSLIM KEYNOTE SPOT » & Leader of Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization gets standing ovation at Democratic Convention -if this isn't a white flag waved in front of terrorists, what would be?
3- 08/23/08 - Saturday Forum: A Former Consular Officer Says Anything Goes For Legal Immigrants With Diseases; etc.As suggested, the money trail was followed, and power-greed turned up, since 99% donations to democrats would antagonize many viewers and advertisers, it can't really be about how to make their media business more money.
Added from: Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Left In Complete Panic Mode As Swiftboaters Televise Obama-Ayers Tightness
From Stop The ACLU» Obama Camp: Prosecute Donors To Group Criticizing ObamaFighting back against Obama’s thugsby Michelle Malkin, shows the ad, which Fox News had been scared off from running, and which is panicking the left apparatus, making their side look as terrorist-friendly as they are. Attempts to suppress even internet coverage of the Obama-Rezko-Auchi axis are found at this Permalink.
Added from: Friday, August 29, 2008

Obama Had Islamic Help To Get Him Into Harvard Law
Muslim Obama Supporter Declares White People Deserve and Want to Have Their Ears and Noses Cut Off- this is the bestial patron of Obama, who got black racial activist Percy Sutton to push for his acceptance into Harvard Law School.
As found at this Permalink, Mansour the terrorist-friendly, Islamic leftist, money man appears to have pressed for Obama to get one of the black quota places at Harvard Law. This could hardly be a disinterested transaction; loyalty to Islam and its terrorist-adoring leftist faction would be an absolute requirement. The left has fallen to such unprincipled depths, that it can be found licking the boots of dark age Islam. The Coup, by Updike, indicates how Islam, leftism and racial hatred are capable of being combined into an ideology for dictatorship. Our major media are depraved enough today, that they could be thrilled by that possibility happening here.
Added from: Saturday, August 30, 2008

Major Media's Foamball Soft Treatment Of Their Black Mascot
is a disgraceful dereliction of a high responsibility, which must be punished relentlessly for years to come. Boycott nationally advertised brands if possible. The urgent need, though, is to make Obama lose and disqualify McCain. A Palin presidency would be an excellent retaliation for what the media and the powerful have failed to do regarding the vetting of Obama and even McCain, their second or fallback choice. As if to prove anew their perfectly depraved dereliction, the big media are crowing over the supposedly world-historical minority victory, of a first major-party black nomination for the presidency. Has it been noticed that only a few months ago, they were insisting that Obama transcends race, and that race doesn't matter; now he's the black candidate of history-making significance. I'm certain the electorate will react with negative response to the beneficiary of such rank contradictions, manipulation and gross dishonesty. The worst must be assumed as to why we can't have reported any negatives on this media-favored candidate.
Added from: Sunday, August 31, 2008

With Openness To Diversity You Get Unilateral Disarmament
The quota placeholder-for-president has the audacity to offer this leftist, ChiCom-obedient program:
"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.
And I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.
Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons, I will seek a ban on the production of fissile material,and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBM's off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenal "
...quoted as found via Steve Schippert on NR Tank here: 08/29 01:51 PM
Since diversity has no connection with positive value in and of itself, valuing openness to diversity as if it did have such value-significance, will result in placing positive value sign on negative moves, and especially openness to them, and such that a unilateral disarmament results, even a literal military one regarding nuclear defenses.
Added 9-15-08 from: Sunday, September 7, 2008

Far Too Much Is Given To The Black Man, & The More The Majority Gives
...the worse the hatred against the majority grows. If the presidency is given, the minority hatred will get much worse, not be softened in any way. No one is making this most obvious point, while millions appear to be proceeding on the opposite assumption. In that feeling, they have much encouragement from those whose presentations are neither sincere nor given in good faith.
added 9-18-08: "Military fears 'unknown quantity' Obama Fretting over 'apparent lack of understanding on the threat of radical Islam' ". Is it lack of understanding, though, or more like what he said in his book, that he stands "with the muslim when the political winds shift"? Why would Obama raise money and give Speeches for Palestinian refugees ?

Input: Diversity, Output: Boredom & Fearfulness

To a civilized society, an additional cohort of Diversity makes for a more boring atmosphere; yet a more fearful and panicky one at the same time. It is systematically this way, and the pro-diversity, with complete malice, rejoice in each increment of this effect. The diversity causes a growing and deepening silence, which stupefies with its thickening overlay of boredom. It is caused by speech codes and one-sided 'anti-racism' and 'anti-discrimination', mindless praise of primitive cultural imports, promoted with government money, and ramified with unknown language and other such divides. Language divisions grow, and the power-greedy become jubilant, celebrating diversity, even though it is only fun and hopeful for them. Fear grows and spreads, as the powerful enforce speech codes. As Diversity multiplies, hostile Islam becomes more likely to enter and spawn its terror offensives. The more open to diversity a society is, the more likely it is to be open even to warlike Islam itself. The pro-diversity in such a place are the most predictable in their ideas; their words tortured, unnatural, boring as government anti-discrimination statements, and tormented with fear of giving offense to those who may discriminate with impunity: The Diversity.
Added Friday, August 29, 2008

Valuing Openness To Diversity Is Quite Alien To The Intent Of The Founders
The U. S. constitution does not say that the government shall have power to force or promote openness to diversity. The bill of rights does not mention a right to impose openness to diversity. It is only in more recent and power-greedy times that officials have tried to change the meaning of freedom of dis-association into freedom-FROM-dis-association. Only recently have the fully depraved begun to speak of all foreigners, as having a right to move here on net public subsidy. Such a pretended right would seem to follow, though, if rights are prior to loyalty to fellow citizens over against foreigners.

The American Electorate Will Not Reverence Official Anti-Caucasianism

The Obamanation of Desolation, by Thomas Fleming, is extraordinary in explicitly laying out the conclusion that Obama comes from anti-Caucasianism. Without endorsing all the positions discussed, the main point would be that we are in danger of crossing a threshold, in which anti-Caucasianism becomes, through the possible election of Obama, an Established, State Religion, that is actually accepted by the majority of the electorate, almost like a referendum. That point very much needs to be made, and made more explicit and expanded upon. The establishment of anti-Caucasianism (as a state religion) has so far been the dirty work of tenured professors and shystering federal judges, all of them unelected, and much opposed by the electorate. The anti-democratic features of the republic have been exploited for the purpose of setting up that state religion; the racial one. Now we're asked to support the likely necessary next step, and vote for the candidate who comes from that religion of anti-Caucasian hatred, thus endorsing the official establishment of it.
This point as well, from the same article, is one that needs to be kept to the forefront:
"I can also understand why public school teachers, social workers, and other welfare-dependents vote for politicians who will certainly increase their income and power."
When all the power that is to be had from exploiting official anti-Caucasianism and the responses to it, has been milked dry, then it will be dropped, just as if no one of consequence had ever believed anything of the sort. Think of the Class War Determined by an Iron Law of History, what became of that; was it dropped because it no longer served the power-greed of those who were pushing it?

Valuing Openness To Islam Threatens The Lasting Extermination Of Gainful Cultural Life

Here is a remarkable quote from Vijay Kumar: "...demographic conquest is the most permanent form of conquest. Therefore, we must support all nations currently struggling with radical Islamic footholds within their societies. The reality is that no place in the world where radical Islam has gained demographic dominance, has it ever been extricated. And it has been its goal for over 1400 years to aggressively spread and multiply by birth or by sword. America needs to openly face up to this reality."
Kumar is running for congress in Tennessee, emphasizing these issues. He also says:
"We should stop immigration from any nation that practices any form of Sharia..."
The entire interview is at the preceding link.
Added 9-26-08 from Tuesday, September 16, 2008

The Valuing Of Openness To Diversity Of Customs, Laws & Sovereignties Means Valuing Civil War
If one should doubt that the above sorts of faux-values lead to openness to contest for who and what shall rule, including even the unspeakably backward; this needs to be observed:Britain Adopts Shari’a
The diversity includes this, and valuing diversity contains NO PRINCIPLE,upon which, one could say:
This far, but no further.
Openness to diversity includes openness to diversity of sovereignties in the same polity, which is to say: Civil war.
Therefore, necessarily, simply valuing openness to diversity also means valuing civil war itself. Observing also that if war is the health of the state, civil war is an even more flourishing condition of the state as power-accumulator at least, it should be realized that power-greed has no end of motivation for encouraging the valuing of openness to diversity of contests for sovereignty, such as would increase the power of officials over against the citizenry.
Another highly salient point to be noted in the article linked above, is the constant maligning of opponents as having Islamophobia, a faux-diagnosis which itself demonstrates resort to unreason on the part of the user. There is no sensible argument for openness to Islam, as is indicated by the need felt at the highest, brightest and best-equipped levels, to use only the smearing approach: Prove you're not Islam-ophobic, racist, prejudiced, etc.
No, it is the power-greedy who must prove that they must have more power to infiltrate more deadly conflict into the precincts of civilization.

A Possibly Original Concept Near The Foundations Of Theoretical Biology

Starting with a conjectural illustration:
Suppose that the lactase-persistence allele of West Europe, the haplotype around which is most uncommonly long (1 million DNA units) has been effectively hijacked by a microbe, a lactobacteria perhaps, which gets the carriers of the allele to treat all other carriers as kindred. It gets at the kin-recognition systems, to promote the treatment of unrelated as if they were much more closely related, though not as close as first cousins.
This would solve the problem of how cooperation which is advantageous to all or nearly all of the cooperators, can become established, and long be sustained, against defectors, cheaters and other free-riders. That is, where the advantage to all carriers, occurs only while there is negligible free-riding by non-carriers. The microbe then becomes a symbiont, and it gains by the spread of the carriers, who are also preferentially carrying it, as through their culture (e.g. dairying). It takes over new acreage, even on a large scale, as the carriers, as a group, have advantage in spontaneous cooperation without compulsion, over other groups, which are much less able to form large undertakings, which may sometimes depend on them acting as if they were much more closely related than they are, when combined in the larger groupings.
Lactase Persistence & Possible Correlates
Friday, May 23, 2008

Unheard-Of Drop In County's Crime Rates Achieved Via Strictness On Illegals

"(AP) - A Prince William County official is attributing a decline in certain types of crime last year to the county's crackdown on illegal immigrants.
A study released last week says homicides declined by 44% from 2006 to 2007. The incidence of rape fell 33%, robberies declined 23%, and aggravated assaults declined 18%.
County board Chairman Corey Stewart says the decrease is due to the resolutions cracking down on illegal immigrants in the county."
As I recall, the main change likely to affect the crime rates, was going after those who presented fake ID, no valid insurance or licenses, etc. This would make not only illegals, but all sorts of other criminals, want to get away from the uncommon heat, and on towards the places that are cool for them. Homicides down by a half in one year! This is unheard-of, at least in large jurisdictions like PW Cty., and I believe it has to mean that their policy change got illegals plus a lot of other criminals to move out.
Official: Immigration crackdown pushes down crime InsideNova.com
also: Hispanic Population in Decline
added 7-28-08 from Malkin: Sanctuary v. enforcement in neighboring counties: a natural experiment.
Added 8-11-08 from: Saturday, August 9, 2008

To Get Illegals To Move Over The County Line Is A Beggar-Thy-Neighbor Policy...
and so says the Washington Post, editorializing on “Prince William, a Year Later.” :
"So what has the county achieved with its effort to intimidate undocumented newcomers by ordering checks on the immigration status of all detainees after arrest and by denying certain social services to illegal immigrants? Without doubt, it has prompted hundreds of Hispanics -- legal and illegal -- to depart the county. Many of them have moved to surrounding jurisdictions, where they are enrolling in public schools and turning to local government services or nonprofits for help. To Mr. Stewart and his allies, this beggar-thy-neighbor policy is a success."
Are we supposed to forget and ignore the rank contradiction, between the usual line about how openness to diversity enriches us, and that, it is candidly stated, pushing illegals on to another jurisdiction tends to "beggar" the receiving one. It can't be both, which demonstrates both that one is being lied to, and that openness to diversity is easily quite questionable as a value. It is easy to have too much of it, and if that were not so, no community could be beggared by having more openness to diversity than its neighbor.

The Hidden 'Hispanic' Republicans: Completely Fake Ones Who Count On Republican Local Predominance...

to preserve their affirmative action jobs. If democrats take over later, these mostly female, quota-fillers, might be out altogether, or be cut off from future promotions. Such jobs pay tens of thousands more than the unreserved equivalents, and the onset of a liberal local regime, ensures a priority of intolerance towards the fake Hispanics in government at least. This source of support, which requires lots of political participation extending to local races such as are ignored by most, could be even the greater part of the 4.8% Republican Hispanic proportion. That is, of the 4.8%, as reported here: profiles based on '08 primaries..., the Hispanic share of the Republican primary voters.

Why A Black Presidency Would Be Demonstrably Divisive In A Highly Damaging Way

Insofar as the American government is characterized by anti-Caucasianism, having this be imposed by someone who isn't white, is enormously more divisive and nourishing of inter-group conflict and hatred, than the status quo. To prove the premise of official anti-Caucasianism, the Voting Rights Act, with its newer interpretation, which simply assumes that the majority racially conspires to exclude disadvantaged minorities' possible candidates, should be quite enough. The burden of proof on those who fail to recruit at racial quota levels, as imposed by the federal courts' disparate impact doctrine, is a pervasive political feature, demonstrating official policy going against the majority and in a racial way. If a black president runs such programs, it is no longer a case of the majority doing this to its own, so to speak, but one in which the majority will be made to feel oppressed by a hostile racial political order, which comes from outside. Such a situation fuels great increase of division and hatred, and that is a clue as to why major media and government academia would be enthused over the prospect. The increase of power is facilitated by the increase of inter-group conflict, that's their incentive. The mainstream right of course, can only quake in cowardice at the prospect of mentioning this racial effect, where a black presidential candidate is undesirable for that reason, and they're scared of the smear offensives which would have them try to prove they're not racist. It never occurs to them that they then would have opportunities to point out that there is no reasonable argument for a lurch to the left, so that only attempted smearing can substitute.
Added 8-3-08 from: Thursday, July 31, 2008

Congress Of Special Pleaders Tries To Stoke Racial Feeling Against The Majority
As found here: « The proposed apology for slavery... on VFR, the burden of proof gets illegitimately shifted away from those who find it convenient politically, to officially claim that black inequality of results was imposed by certain policies back in history.There are no blacks who can prove that they would have inherited anything additional, if it were not for some state laws regarding segregation, much less slavery 150 years ago. None of them used segregated government schools and other unnecessarily public facilities except by privilege, but never as a right. There are millions of others, though, who can document that they had to pay taxes far beyond what they could take from the public programs. It is the net taxpayers who have a demonstrable grievance. Special pleading is motivated not by a sense of justice, but by the power that comes from representing a group of those who cannot press a valid claim individually. This all goes with the push to rally round the weakest, where deceitful posturing tries to place culpability on the able, making excuses for failure as merely a case of not being shared with.
With a black almost nominated for a major party's presidential candidacy, the majority can easily conclude by now, that the rise of Obama means more, not less, racial special pleading. The more you acknowledge and respect the special pleaders, the more they ask for, with absolutely no principles or morals to limit their demands in the least degree. The congressmen who pushed for, and many who voted for, the current resolution would know this perfectly well, but they think you don't. They are depraved. Too depressing to dwell on just now? Well then: Go Ahead, Laugh at Obama
Sample quote from Gerard Baker: "It came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness. The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow. When he was twelve years old, they found him in the temple in the City of Chicago, arguing the finer points of community organisation with the Prophet Jeremiah and the Elders. And the Elders were astonished at what they heard and said among themselves: ³Verily, who is this Child that he opens our hearts and minds to the audacity of hope?"
Posted by John S. Bolton
Added 8-16-08 from: Tuesday, August 12, 2008

The Effrontery Of Anti-Merit Hopes And Dreams
from runaway fathers. America must not respect anything like that. If the revolution of rising expectations, for higher prestige for the disreputable, is well underway, violent stirrings easily may soon boil over into riots.
Added 8-13-08 from: Monday, August 11, 2008 Why Barack Obama Will Not WinThis is a sober and sound analysis, although Warshawsky's use of the exit polls' estimate on Hispanic voting is off in the usual way. 8% was really 6%, and Bush didn't get 44% but well under 40% of their votes.From the linked article:"....named the Most Liberal Senator for 2007 by the National Journal . This distinction does not augur well for Obama. John Kerry was named the Most Liberal Senator for 2003 -- the year before he lost the 2004 presidential contest to Bush. As a U.S. Senator, Obama has voted along Democratic Party lines 97 percent of the time, almost 10 percentage points higher than the average for Senate Democrats." Even though the major regulated media are nakedly doing advocacy for Obama, many of the truths mentioned in the article will become widely known among the electorate.
Added 8-26-08 from: Sunday, August 24, 2008

Prove That You're Not Moved By Racial Hatred, Or How To Shift The Responsibility
of making a case, on to your opponent. Found through this link Jacob Weisberg/Slate: only racism prevents Barack Obama from being elected :"Jacob Weisberg of Slate offers 'If Obama Loses/Racism is the only reason McCain might beat him' (link). I hopefully don't need to excerpt any of it to point out that it's not only wrong, it's also a roadmap for how the Democratic Party will operate for the next four years (or in perpetuity). Note that Weisburg isn't just some nobody; he's the 'editor-in-chief of the Slate Group'."
Black-privilege Obama doesn't have to show that he's good enough to be President, the voters have to prove that they have some reasons other than racial hatred to not support him. The left has no rational argument why they should have more power, which is why only this smearing, slippery-slope, racialized method has to be used. When they say that 'only racism' is involved, that shows the slippery-slope insinuations are being applied, since there are actually many intermediate points between zero racism and 'only racism', as if everyone who was wary of blacks wanted to kill them all. This also shows that the electorate does have a perfectly convincing racial reason to be worried about supporting Obama; such a privilege of not having to make a case, but just leaving it to others to try and prove that their motives are not racial, will be exploited again and again. Further, if this attempted smearing of the voters doesn't work this time, it is less likely to be used the next time, and that's worth something, too.