Sunday, September 14, 2008

The Electorate Is Presumed Guilty Until Momentarily Proven Innocent

while Obama is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty, even though he is an applicant for the very highest security clearance, that is issued by the electorate. If this doesn't exemplify official anti-caucasianism, to be such a widespread assumption in the media and beyond, what would?
Added from Tuesday, September 16, 2008

The Presumption Of Innocence For Terrorists & Terrorist-Friendly Obama, While Guilt Is To Be Presumed Of The Electorate?
09/14/08 - The Fulford File: Guilty As Hell, Free As A Bird—Ayers, Obama, And The Exclusionary Rule, by James Fulford
Reading the above, one can hardly escape the conclusion that Obama regards Ayers as two different moral beings, at least rhetorically. One Ayers ran wild in the 1960's; the other Ayers is entitled to a presumption of innocence, whether charged anew or not. The new Ayers is "establishment" and "respectable". Such a treatment is grossly, nihilistically subversive of morality, and this has to be pointed out again and again, but, most of all it shows that Obama is terrorist-friendly. The electorate, unlike Dohrn, for example, has never, and will never, be charged with, and put on trial for, any crime whatsoever. Somehow, though, this vast electorate, or at least the majority of it, gets presumed guilty of rejecting the world-historical Obam-enon, solely from racial hatred such as would be on a slippery-slope to mass-murder, presumably. Ayers gets away with murder, gets called "respectable" by Obama, while the electorate is somehow obliged to prove itself innocent of any and every racialized accusation by voting for black-as-black. Only government schools could get such a procedure regarded as justice and not monstrous injustice.

No comments: