Monday, September 15, 2008

America's First Racial Election For The Presidency As Declared By Biden

Obama's racial identity: "That will be a transformative event in American politics and internationally," Biden said. "That all by itself will be significant." The quote from Biden is to be found here: Biden: Elect Obama because He’s Black
Most important is to point out that there is no reasonable argument for a move to the left, and the power that undeserving officials get from that leftward move. If there were, it would be used, and not the smearing suggestion that the only impulse behind a vote against the black candidate is racial hatred.
It is really major media, officialdom and its professoriate which by now, should have to prove that they are not motivated entirely by racial hatred-against the majority-that is. The power-greedy have nothing to offer rationally; only illegitimate manipulations are possible for them. Officials have too much, not too little, power. They are not known to have too little power, that's what it's all about.
Added 9-26-08 from : Wednesday, September 17, 2008

Don't You Snitch On Obama!
It's 'smearing' if you do mention before the public, that Obama has far-left connections, has voted leftwards even of the only socialist senator, and can quite sensibly be described as terrorist-friendly. Isn't it interesting that 'smearing' is redefined to occupy the place where one would expect the term 'snitching' to be used? Maybe it will be noticed that those who react more against national-political snitching, than against that which is snitched on, are implacable left-supporters regardless. That is part of what it means to be on the left: You don't snitch on those who facilitate power-greed, at least the anti-volitionist, anti-hereditarian kind of power-seeking. :Obama FINALLY Admits Communist Connection-----------"The Mainstream media has been attacking Jerome Corsi’s book, The Obama Nation at every opportunity possible. I wonder if any of them actually tried to investigate any of the facts. Doubtful. But here is a fact Senator Obama confirms. In the midst of his massive rebuttal to the book, Senator Obama ADMITS his close relationship with Frank Marshall Davis. Of course, he doesn't mention the part about Davis being a bigshot in the Communist Party of the US..."Obama's murky past: "While the New York Times crack investigative staff is busily pursuing a 4-H pal of Sarah Palin's, they seem to have missed the biggest story of this election cycle. Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn are unrepentent terrorists who even today advocate communism and the overthrow of the United States government. They launched and orchestrated Barack Obama's career, providing him with the qualifications necessary to run for major political office. Repeat: communists and terrorists launched Obama's career. And the fossils at the Times, who are rapidly sinking into financial quicksand, can't bother to report the story."What if in 1960, several books on Kennedy connections to fascism and mafia activities a decade or two earlier, had been published? Something like that hypothetical is happening to Obama now, and it's many times more significant than the 'swiftboating' of Kerry, which mainly exposed fish story-type lies and embellishments


Audacious Epigone said...

What truly depresses me is the chorus from the right-leaning middle (and on the 'moderate' right) expressing happiness that no matter what happens, this Presidential race will be "historic". The hard left, of course, won't grant them that, yet the naked play to 'beat' the left at its own game evinces the cultural environment, characterized by obsession with group identity with individual merit ignored.

John S. Bolton said...

As if our history would belong in a natural history museum. The first black is world-historical somehow. They are either being disgracefully easily duped, or are complicit in the set up: as though it were legitimate to suggest that the only reason anyone could vote aginst obama were his racial background.

Audacious Epigone said...

With the moderate right's counter that anyone who would vote against Hillary and then against Palin is a sexist.

And as though most US Presidential election are not historic...

John S. Bolton said...

Not to mention that Obama would be at least somewhat historic, as the leftmost major party candidate relative to what exists in the senate, other than perhaps McGovern in 1972. The media is making history, or chronicle at least in this cycle, having got 68% of the public to believe that reporters work to get their preference elected. A profession is dying a miserable death, and their chronicle-making Obama may not have much of a chance by now even. That the moderate right plays along with this 'we're making history' nonsense, is a disgrace. Is Foxnews seconding that motion? They and others had better snap out of it, if they don't want to have their credibility go down along with the liber-I mean progressives.