Connecting The Concept Of Power-Greed...

with the thought of Ayn Rand, one finds what she called power lust, identified with an impulse to destroy. From The Left: Old And New, :"...the lust for power, i.e., the lust to destroy".

Parapundit Finds Alarming Story From South Africa

in which egalitarian policies generate damage to production
• South Africa Becomes Net Food Importer

With The Federal Reserve Buying Enormous Volume

of new and old credit, continuing at the same rate they would own all the treasury debts in private hands before long and that is inflationary. If not today, then before many months have passed, an inflationary effect should show

Another View Of The Question Of Yesterday's Post

on why academia is left-heavy, from Dr John J. Ray: my own explanation. Who also quotes a Schumpeterian view: More here

A Positive Feedback Loop Between Indoctrination For

the equality of potential among human lineages, and the growth of government schools, is part of the explanation of how such schools become left-heavy. When these schools reach their saturation point, becoming no longer capable of recruiting a larger percentage into their precincts, the feedback loop goes neutral, no longer positive.

The Left Is Unprincipled Insofar As It Can Join Forces

with the more terroristic elements of Islam. The claims to being about freedom and modernity, rationality and morals, are shown to be propaganda when that collusion of the left and Islam, is found.

Eligibility Lawsuits Update

Wrotnowski Stay Denied

The Social Lamarckians Are Not Extinct

Quoting Ayn Rand: "...the notion that men can be conditioned to communism genetically-- that is, that a few generations conditioned by dictatorship will transmit communist ideology to their descendants, who will be communists at birth." Human identity does not change, though; even Russian, Chinese and several religious, identities persisted through several generations of ruthless communist rule. The point about a Social Lamarckism is that there are still those who believe in the inheritance of acquired characteristics, and that such can be induced politically, so as to equalize various groups, or whatever the purported ideal excusing power of that kind may be.

America's Right Summarizes Today's Four Biggest Eligibility Lawsuits

Four Main Cases, One Tough Road Likewise, from Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Fighting an Uphill Battle in Rollerskates Challenging Obama's Eligibility Only Steps from th...

Other Eligibility Lawsuits Make It To The Top

as this one : Wrotnowski case docketed A summary of the issue is here: Obama and the Natural Born Citizen Clause

SCOTUS Declines To Grant Stay In An Eligibility Case

but others may still get through. Permalink & these decisions Also see this from Dr. Jack Wheeler

The Further Left A Regime Is, The More Strict The Censorship

is found to be under it. From this one knows as well, that reason is not thought to be on the side of moves to the left, even by those running regimes of that kind.

It Seems Unbelievable That The High Court Might Leave Obama Unaccountable

and having to answer to no one, in spite of being required to answer to the Supreme Court, to avoid admission of ineligibility. The rule of law means we don't have anyone who is that unaccountable, therefore the court will have to proceed against him for such defiance.

The Encapsulations Self-Regenerative

a definition of life. Living beings grow and reproduce as individuals, encapsulations one could say, especially relative to activities of the reproductive and self-regenerating kind.

Dec. 5th Supreme Court Conference On Obama's Eligibility

as found here: Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?
Follow the links to explore the major media news blackout on this momentous issue.
also from: Thursday, November 27, 2008
Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
& from Sunday, November 30, 2008
Our Republic Must Be 'A Government Of Laws & Not Of Men'
...while Obama just defying the Supreme Court would mean most fundamental lawlessness relative to our constitutional law. Law, or personalities on a political stage, mindlessly vying for power, those are the alternatives. Personalities being treated as above the law because they have been fetishized by corrupted media, are not compatible with the continuity of the republic as such, as described above. The high court cannot reasonably evade this conflict.
& from Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Obama Allows Ineligibility To Stand Unchallenged
on the level of a Supreme Court proceeding: Solicitor general's office dodges questions about birth certificate complaint-- also see Berg to File Emergency Injunction Today, Awaits Answer from Barack Obama and DNC ...though they have two days for mail delivery (i.e. some time Wednesday) still left to respond, the verdict would appear to be that there has been an admission by default of ineligibility
& from Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Lots Of Information On Eligibility Lawsuits
...at this Permalink

To Fix The 'Credit Jam' Regulators Could Lower The Capital Requirements

but for those banks which increase their volume of lending, and in proportion as they do so. This would bring back home equity lending on a much larger scale, as there would be two ways to compete. One being to be the sounder and more likely to take over other banks, and the other being to increase lending for the consideration, and gain revenue while being under less-strict rules. The risks of inflation and unsoundness are obvious but perhaps not greater than alternatives.

Will The Fed Start Buying State Debt Issues

this is an odd jab at predicting the next move of interventions aimed at getting large sums out where they'll be spent immediately.

American Thinker Runs Two Articles On The Correlation

between the rise of Obama and the declines in market valuations: More
& see also The Obama Market. From October, and, for substantiation of the correlation and the direction of the arrow of causality, see : An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

From Alan Keyes Eligibility Lawsuit

"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,"

Eligibility Lawsuits Find Litigants With Unquestionable Standing

as here. Also, from Friday, November 14, 2008
More On Eligibility Lawsuits
From this link, where quite a few are underway in many states: Obama camp: Lawsuits by citizens are 'garbage'
Added from Tuesday, November 18, 2008
A Commenter Draws Out The Key Issue For The Eligibility Lawsuits
From the comments on the next post down: "Indonesia, at the time Obama lived there and was deemed an Indonesian citizen, did not recognize dual citizenship, and neither did the US recognize dual citizenship with Indonesia."

"Unrepentant Terrorist" Ayers Gets Treated As A Moral Authority...

...by major media, as he pontificates on how there is supposedly no place in American politics for 'guilt by association'. All the while, Obama has been an applicant for the highest security clearance, and by no means to be given a presumption of innocence in that regard. The electorate had only to trust or distrust, not to indict or determine guilt. Therefore the story of 'guilt by association' is not known to be true or reasonable. The granting of moral authority to such as Ayers is in itself an indulgence of gross amoralism, of journalistic nihilism even.

The More You Hate America & Americans, The More You Favor Which Candidate...

for president, and which party? This is an inductive generalization, which you have either observed the underlying facts in support of, or not.

A Learned & Industrious Observer Of Obama Concludes As Follows:

"STANLEY KURTZ: The real Obama — the man beyond the feel-good symbol — is a far-left radical. “What We Know About Obama”"
To repeat and clarify: AS applicant for our top security clearance and the command-in-chief of the armed forces, a candidate for president must get NO presumption of innocence IN THAT REGARD. Addition: " report has come out summarizing everything these people did. You can read it here. The FBI file, some 400 plus pages, is available here." from this piece by Jim Simpson

Applicants For The Highest Security Clearance Must Get No Presumption Of Innocence

Regardless of what is said about 'guilt by association', the voters do not indict or accuse; they trust or distrust one or the other of the two. Each candidate is an applicant for this very high security clearance, and must win trust relative to the other, not just complain about being supposedly being judged guilty, when the electorate does not even accuse, in its capacity as voters. This is why long affinity for far left, subversive, even terroristic types, like Ayers and Dohrn, is an issue that can't go away. The application is for the command-in-chief of the armed forces, a responsibility which the electorate can't help but take seriously.

A Positive Feedback Mechanism With Down & Up Markets

works in favor of Obama and McCain respectively. Markets down, gets poll numbers up for Obama, and that reinforces itself. The reverse process operates for McCain, and can snowball.
Added later: NR mentions "Obama Panic" concept, though not in so many words. McCain Rally, or McCain restores confidence, is closely related to this idea as well. See: “Obama’s Stock”
see also: Obama and the Stock Market and its references, and, for substantiation of the correlation and the direction of the arrow of causality, see : An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

A Left Which Uses Financial Panic-Mongering Should Lose Massively

especially since they would then seem not to care about the collateral damage. Power is much more important to them.
Addition: Dissecting Leftism has information on how dishonest the major polls are from here

Polls Dishonesty Enforcers

"Death Threats Sent to Pollster: After releasing this morning’s numbers showing McCain ahead in Ohio and Florida, the Strategic Vision polling company received several death threats through the contact e-mail on the company’s web site. David Johnson, the CEO of Strategic Vision, shared the messages with National Review Online. One of the messages stated: My goodness, your polls . . . Go"

This Is Why Collaboration With Ayers Is So Bad

Permalink Ayers and his circle believed that tens of millions of Americans would have to be killed

Has Obama Admitted That He Is Not Eligible?

from this: "
A motion requesting an immediate order deeming his request for admissions served upon Barack Obama and the DNC on September 15 admitted by default, and
A motion requesting an expedited ruling and/or hearing on Berg’s motion deeming the request for admissions served upon Obama and the DNC admitted. " At this Permalink , one finds that already nine lawsuits have been filed to demand eligibility determination
added later: Berg to U.S. Supreme Court this Afternoon

Obama's Excuse-Making For Criminals Echoes Old Bomber Ayers

From this Source:" wrote what the New York Times called a 'rave review' of a book by William Ayers that, among other things, said “he’d like to see the prison system itself essentially demolished,' comparing the American prison system to South Africa’s mass detention of young blacks';
campaigned himself against 'the industrial prison complex';
in 1998 'was one of only three Illinois state senators to vote against a proposal making it a criminal offense for convicts on probation or on bail to have contact with a street gang';
in support of a bill against racial profiling, argued that statistical disparities in arrests were proof of racism and discrimination by the police. Note that Kurtz’s summary here of Obama’s legislative record in Springfield...[more at the link]
The pattern here is what I call a liking for freedom-FOR-aggression, and a dislike of at least others', freedom-FROM-aggression. Under such a heading, a great variety of votes and positions form up into a coherence of sorts.

Polls Credibility

"The polls usually show the Democrat ahead "Reviewing the polls printed in the New York Times and the Washington Post in the last month of every presidential election since 1976, I found the polls were never wrong in a friendly way to Republicans. When the polls were wrong, which was often, they overestimated support for the Democrat, usually by about 6 to 10 points. "
Added later: Sunday, October 19, 2008

Presidential Race Is Closer Than The Numbers Given In Major Polls
Source tells you how for decades, the polls have consistently overstated democratic support for a presidential candidate, in a uniform one-sided way & the Bradley Effect could be ten points according to analyst cited. The two in this case, may overlap considerably

Great Work From Audacious Epigone

Wednesday, October 15, 2008
An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

The Conditions Of The Last Month Politically & Economically...

have caused a psychological toll on the entire urban world, so I must confess that I have been psychologically affected as well. I am working as usual, but otherwise I must slow down on my internet participation a bit

"The Success Of A Con Man Augments His Panic"

This is quoted from memory from Rand. For each increment that Obama is to the left of what he is pretended to be, he is that much more of a fraud. He is under that much more of a panicky stress. For an admitted dope user, he will be that much more likely to use more and worse dope, for each increment as above.
The deceiver is destroyed by his fears of being found out; he breaks down. He breaks down the faster the further out from truth his deception runs. All of this hugely intensified by the scale of the attention on the one deceiver, who has all the world looking at him, and many may interpret what they see as a dope user.

The Obama Panic Can Be Stopped & Soon...

...if those contacted by pollsters would say they're not voting for Obama. It is the uncertainty spreading through the world, on how far left Obama might actually turn out to be, with a major media chorus later, ferociously supporting moves to nationalize in many directions. A positive feedback mechanism can develop from this, where markets freeze from uncertainty, and are considered too important to be left to flounder on their own. Markets look to the future, and this global panic has to be, by now, in large part, about the scare that Obama, so long willingly subordinate to wild left-wing terrorists, may seize an opportunity for collectivization, if elected. Therefore, this fear can be forestalled, by McCain's support level moving up even or higher. ____________Added Sat. Aft. from NewsBusters.org»
IBD: Market Dive Due to Impending 'First Socialist President,',
the concept of the Obama Panic is being published today to the millions. especially to be noted is the insistence that the markets look ahead, so it is about Obama, not Bush or anyone building up to this point from the past. The markets are not blaming, but projecting months or more out.
As I may have been first to publish on: Tuesday, October 7, 2008" The Obama Panic Is On
or, if not, why don't investors feel confident when polls are suggesting an Obama win? If a move to the left, or towards the Hope for Change, will not be bad for America and for the investors therein, shouldn't markets be soaring on that Hope for Change (AKA Obama leftism and smash that old devil Wall Street). "
...& on Friday, October 10, 2008 I posted another one on how
The Obama Panic Is On: Money Talks In Its Own Language & CEO's Say It In English...
"...74 percent of the executives say they fear that an Obama presidency would be disastrous for the country, while only 19 percent fear a McCain presidency." Survey: CEOs Say Obama Would Be Disastrous Each of these corroborates the other; one can't easily lie, the other is unlikely to...

Obama Tries To Cover Over With Soil His ACORN Base Of Supporters

Obama Campaign Caught in ACORN Lies, to hide this support base, is much as admitting that their reputation is horrific & see: Barack Obama lied about ACORN involvement (he was a trainer).

Are There Some Enemies Of America Who Don't Want Obama In &...

Question: Does Barack Obama Have Any Friends Who AREN'T Communists?- which is a good summary of how far left and wild Obama's affinities are. Slowly, the people have been finding this out. The last piece of the puzzle to go into place, is the recognition that markets look a little ahead, and seeing Obama ahead, they panic everywhere. The Obama panic is on. If it were a McCain one, looking backwards at Bush, then days when McCain was close to being ahead, would be the times of the huge sell-offs. It's the other way though: Obama up, markets down, way, way down.
Thursday, October 9, 2008

Damning USSR Document Which Should Preclude Biden From High Security Clearance
...such as the electorate is responsible to give or withhold. Shocking revelations about Biden in Soviet-era documents

The Obama Panic Reveals 5 (?) MILLION Mortgages To Illegals

Presumably all of these used fake ID's- number is attributed to the US HUD agency at this link
As bad as this sounds, it does suggest a way to ameliorate the subprime problem: Selectively deport those who are behind on payments. The remainder will rush to pay, even though their future credit rating means nothing to them, when using fake ID such as the matricula consular.
A most urgent inquiry for government and the right to undertake is this: Is there a pro-Obama Financial Jihad underway, and is Mexico chiming in with that, encouraging its illegals here to stop paying mortgages? In this connection consider that the sheriff of Cook County, (Chicago) is attempting a moratorium on foreclosures, which is subversive in much the same way. If there are actually attacks from so many directions at once, Bush may have to have a go at Iran now, flush these subverters out and down.
Update: KFYI's follow-up: http://kfyi.com/pages/local_news.html?feed=118695&article=4381201

Conclusive Documentary Proof Of The Far Left Political Identity Of BHO

Archives prove Obama was a New [*] Party member =dispositive as to unfitness for the command-in-chief of our forces and the highest security clearance which the voters can give...
__________*"The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of 'fusion' failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling. But dissolving the party didn't stop the membership, including Barack Obama, from continuing..."
quoted from this Source

The Command-In-Chief Of The Armed Forces Of the U.S.A. To One With These Associations (RNC-detailed)...

Relationship called 'much more extensive' than senator is willing to admit--Republican National Committee
This is the word from the top of the moderate right political structure; no jokes, no smears, just the devastating associations, which I say are disqualifying for the command-in-chief of our armed forces. Added Thursday: Murtaugh to continue focus on Ayers, and they're drawing the connection to qualifications for the command-in-chief of the armed forces, as is crucial. Obama is an applicant for that, not one entitled to a presumption of innocence from 'guilt by association'. He must win our trust, not pretend that it is just owed to him.

Progressives Try To Rescue Obama From The Shadow Of Bomber Ayers With Specious Analogies

Marc Cooper/Huffington Post pretends Obama/Ayers similar to McCain/David Ifshin
my comment is at the link

Obama & The Left Know Where Their Weakest Point Is, & Are Willing To Ditch All Pretended Principles...

such as freedom of political publication, to cover up their most vulnerable spot.
--------------"When an outside group ran TV ads pointing out links between Obama and the former Weatherman terrorist Bill Ayers, the Obama campaign asked the Bush Justice Department — yes, that Bush Justice Department, the [supposed] fount of all evil — to open a criminal investigation."
Quoted from Rich Lowry of NR here: “Free Speech...” (Also see: this report which tells of the Justice department leftists who will be involved in the sending of election observers, who are illicit contributors to Obama, apparently unafraid of the administration becoming wakeful on this )
Being a trusted colleague and collaborator of terrorists, means being unable to win the trust of the voters who know of this disqualification for the command-in-chief of the armed forces. There may be a 'now or never' feeling on the left, as they appear to be willing to use a scorched-earth policy relative to the reputation of the major media outlets, as if believing that other outlets may henceforth come to political dominance. If so, it is that much more important to cause them to lose this time, because of the danger that they would be tempted to extreme measures, to avoid losing influence such as they have now through big media.
_______________________..."Chicago Mayor Richard Daley, who is close to both men, describe[s] them as 'friends?'
'They're friends,' he said. 'So what?'
Two questions: Shouldn't Mayor Daley's comments be included in articles assessing the relationship between Ayers and Obama? Are 'friends' different than 'pals'?"
Quoted from: Stephen F. Hayes at this Permalink

To Be A Trusted Colleague Of Known Terrorists, As Obama...

has long been, to Ayers and Dohrn, is to destroy the chance of being trusted by the informed and loyal electorate, with the command-in-chief of our armed forces. As a trusted leader of terrorist-allied Rathke's ACORN activities, Obama also must forfeit that same trust of the electorate as above. At this link, one may find others which indicate hitherto unheralded depth to the collegiality and collaborations of Obama: Ruh-Roh... Palin Tells Crowd Obama Is "Palling Around" With Terrorists, i.e. with weathermen Ayers and Dohrn. Trust is earned, not given, especially in the case of our very highest security clearance, which is yet decided by the electorate.
________________ "...the Joyce Foundation, and especially Ms. Leff, had a longstanding and ongoing relationship with Bill Ayers, whom Ms. Leff considered to be in charge of developing the Chicago Annenberg Challenge."
Quoted from this Source, where further substantiation as to the above is to be found
as also here: William Ayers and Barack Obama: Finally exposed
& here: Exclusive: Joseph Farah spotlights history behind Obama's ties to 3 domestic terrorists"

The Iron-Bound Racial Character Of The Obama Candidacy

...is known especially by the way it is pretended that he is moderate, centrist, bipartisan, post-partisan and a unifier. Actually he is the leftmost senator, voting even leftwards of the one SOCIALIST, and more consistently with his party. If Obama is nevertheless presented as a centrist like McCain, i.e. on net balance, regarding issues, that leaves only the prospective racial changeover as the hoped-for and waited-for Change. Racial change, as a value-in-itself, is change we don't need.

Subprime Skullduggery, Or The Selfless Civil Servant As Financial Terrorist

and the bombthrowers are doing their Weathermen-like job on Wall Street. All of this favors the election of the leftmost senator, and a lurch to the left such as would increase the power of many an official, which would be quite convenient for them.
"Note that by requiring the use of the mark to market rule, the government that required that subprime loans be made, is now requiring that they be written down to near zero values that Secretary [Paulson] is advising the Congress are much less than their real worth. After all, his argument in selling his plan to the Congress is that the government can hold the loans for a short while and then sell them into the market for large profits. But, unless and until the mark to market rule is rescinded, The government will be able to sell subprime loans only to nonpublicly traded companies. So, to unload these loans for the promised profits, the mark to market rule will [be] rescinded when it is in the interests of our government to do so. In essence, the U. S. Government has required banks and other mortgage lenders to make imprudent subprime loans and, under Paulson's plan, gets to steal them and later sell them for a profit. This is not a bailout. It is highway robbery."
quoted from here: #

If You Like Some Terrorists, & They Like You, Does That Mean You Are Terrorist-Friendly?

"Weathermen terrorists declare support for Obama
Call for 'grassroots effort' to help boost campaign [...] …Exclusive: Joseph Farah spotlights history behind Obama's ties to 3 domestic terrorists"
Plus, a little off-topic: David Bernstein, says a most uncommon special dispensation appears to have been offered to Obama for a position at the University of Chicago, tenure upon hiring without having published even one scholarly article, at a school with the strictest standards until then at least.
Back on to Obama's mutual favor with terrorists and such:
If financial terrorists were active on a large scale just now, whom would they favor?

More Openness To Diversity Yields More Amoral Familism

...since the world is populated overwhelmingly with such family traditions. The more such families you admit, the less the prospects for even marginal attenuation stateside, of the world's near-consensus AGAINST treating strangers fairly, as if they were relatives ( i.e. extended-family ones)."Mass immigration has introduced alien ethnic cronyism on a vast scale into America, as any student not only of today’s deluge but also of the Great Wave well knows. The whole point of amoral familism is that among many of the world’s ethnic groups honesty to those with whom one does not have close kinship ties is not normal and accepted behavior."
from: Amoral Familism And Baby Formula
...perhaps totally unrelated:
"A READER AT A MAJOR NEWSROOM EMAILS: Off the record, every suspicion you have about MSM being in the tank for O is true. We have a team of 4 people going thru dumpsters in Alaska and 4 in arizona. Not a single one looking into Acorn, Ayers or Freddiemae. Editor refuses to publish anything that would jeopardize election for O, and betting you dollars to donuts same is true at NYT, others. People cheer when CNN or NBC run another Palin-mocking but raising any reasonable inquiry into obama is derided or flat out ignored. "

The Media Unaccountability Of Obama Shows That Worse Must Be Expected If He Won

If the major media now refuse to hold Obama accountable for his positions, but cover for him, much as if they were his campaign spokesmen, doesn't it have to be much worse if a sitting president, with all the power of that office, held that racial privilege of media unaccountability? May the electorate reasonably trust major media, officialdom or academia to hold this racial candidate accountable if he became president? They won't do it now, and he has no effective way to get back at them for violating any such omerta, with his current position. One still has to go to the internet or the far right publications to get this most basic and necessary information for voting as a responsible citizen:
________"...Obama voted with his party 96 percent of the time. In the prior two years, his number was 95 percent, making him the fourth most partisan member of the Senate. And not just partisan, but also highly ideological. In 2007, according to the National Journal, Obama's voting record made him 'the most liberal Senator.' Throughout his Senate career, according to Americans for Democratic Action (ADA), the dean of liberal advocacy groups, Obama voted 'right' 90 percent of the time. Actually this is misleading, since ADA counts an absence as if it were a vote on the 'wrong' side. If we discount his absences, Obama voted to ADA's approval more than 98 percent of the time."
...quoted from Joshua Muravchik at (an online-only contribution to) Commentary found via VFR
The worse someone is, the more he gets out of a refusal to bring up negatives. It's hard to think of a more anti-moral proceeding, than one which rewards the bad in proportion as they are bad, and power-greedy. When the very intelligent, worldly, knowledgeable and socially accomplished do precisely the above-criticized operations, isn't it likely to be deliberate and aimed at aggrandizing power? There's little chance of a mistake, other than a typical one of over-ambition, which is an occupational hazard, so to speak, of their avocation to power.

Aggressive Intolerance From The Quota-Placeholder

As quoted from this and the following links:
"Does Barack Obama support the First Amendment? (answer: well, it depends)
Is Barack Obama a strong proponent of the First Amendment? Does he support free speech, even by those who strongly disagree with him? The answer is: not really.
I'll keep track in reverse chronological order:
* Public officials in St. Louis/Missouri threaten Obama opponents with criminal libel? (apparently under the direction of or with the input of the BHO campaign)
* Barack Obama threatens licenses of stations running NRA ad (National Rifle Association)
* Obama quote: '[immigrants and illegal aliens are] counting on us to stop the hateful rhetoric filling our airwaves – rhetoric that poisons our political discourse, degrades our democracy, and has no place in this great nation.' That's a reference to commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Lou Dobbs, two people that Obama has not only smeared but lied about. Clearly, he doesn't just disagree with them, he doesn't want them to have the right to speak."
Politics being the ethics of aggression, there is only one consideration, which party tries to expand the scope of aggression more than the other? If one is to assign rank to different kinds of aggression in our polity, rating one sort more dangerous than another, threats to political speech being more aggressive on one side than another, may be dispositive. Not only does Obama show up as the lowly one on this consideration, but he effectively acknowledges his weakness relative to the truth coming out, for the mass audience, on his actual inclination and associations. As applicants for the highest security clearance, to be given by the electorate, all questionable associations must be brought up for public questioning.
Added from Thursday, October 2, 2008

A Major Move To The Left Needs Enforcement Of News Blackouts...
... in major media through state intimidation. If not so, why would this be attempted:
“Obama’s Assault on the First Amendment”
"Item: Both Obama and his running mate, Sen. Joe Biden, have indicated that an Obama administration would use its control of the Justice Department to prosecute its political opponents... [...]
Item: There is a troubling report that the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Section, top officials of which are Obama contributors, has suggested criminal prosecutions against those they anticipate will engage in voter 'intimidation' or 'oppression' in an election involving a black candidate"
An indication is to be seen here as well, that the anti-volitionist, materialistic left, greatly outdoes the spiritual, volitionistic right, in bold aggression against freedom of political speech and publication. If the left cannot behave even in this one area, where they should have some credibility on a par with the larger right-wing, they deserve no chance at power, as may be given by the electorate.Those who rose by one unearned special dispensation after another, have the least respect for other's rights. It's the effrontery of the protected classes, moving on toward change we don't need.

Politics Being The Ethics Of Aggression, It All Comes Down To Who Stands For More Aggression...

..to be visited on those within the jurisdiction for which the decision (of the electorate) is to be made. No other consideration is relevant in comparison to this, as the politics can only reasonably be distinguished from the non-political realm, by reference to whether it falls under the heading of ethics of aggression, or not.
From the Augusta Chronicle:
"Mr. Obama was the only member of the state Senate to vote against a bill to prohibit the early release of convicted criminal sexual abusers; and was among only four who voted against bills to toughen criminal sentences, increase penalties for criminals whose offenses were committed in the furtherance of gang activities..."
From GC of GNXP : " Obama is beloved by both Yale *and* Jail, and is an apologist for criminal vermin like the Jena Six. "
Supporting link for the above: Krissah Williams Thompson reports on the push to register felons to vote for Obama. Is there a reasonable expectation, other than operator error, in which such felons are registered, and would vote other than for Obama? If not, that tells us quite a lot in itself.
The following quotes are from Corsi's bestselling exposé and are adduced as unchallenged by Obama:
"Obama was deeply influenced by Frantz Fanon..." [JB characterization of Fanon: poster boy of anti-caucasianism for the academic left, known for advocating violent aggression against whites as liberating for blacks]
"Odinga supporters expressed their anger at losing the December 2007 election by engaging in a wave of tribal and religious violence in which machete-wielding Luo mobs killed 1,000 people and displaced approximately 350,000 more. [pages 103-107]
The post-election violence included massacres of Christians in which Luo mob supporters of Odinga damaged more than 300 churches, including burning to death 50 people who sought refuge in a Christian church in the town of Eldoret. [page 104]"
This is the same Odinga who was supported by Obama, and who through U.S. intervention has now acquired a top position in the Kenyan government. Obama's loyalties are to the subhuman aggressor, and America will not accept that.