Saturday, March 22, 2008

Anti-Merit Activists Soar To The Height Of Power...

...in a polity devoted to anti-discrimination and axiomatic equality of all genetically distinguishable sub-groups. Such a polity circles down into subhuman, anti-merit savagery.
It tends to become an anti-merit pesthole, and the more so, the more it adheres to equalization (as a goal allowing for the increase of power, to get more equality between the groups as above).
The more you give, on a racial-egalitarian basis, the more is believed to be needed, and the more distress is felt, that the improvement of environments does not lead to notable merit results, among the children of the target groups.
To understand why the more is given and done, the more the cries of distress from the uplifted redouble, it is imperative to consider this:
The Widening Racial Scoring Gap on the SAT College Admissions Test " Blacks from families with incomes of more than $100,000 [ scored ] 10 points below the average score of white students from families whose income was less than $10,000."
Even a ten-fold increase in income cannot equalize. Recall that children do not have their own
'class' or socio-economic status; they have that of their parents. The above results are of juveniles applying to college from households with certain income ranges and racial eligibilities.
The income differentials indicated are worlds apart in terms of the range of choice of environments that they permit.
The power-greedy know all this, and relish the divisions which are intensified, so that increase of power may be made to flow from the process.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thats pretty depressing......


The poor we will always have with us.


Everybody is satisfied with his intelligence, but hardly anybody is satisfied with his wealth.....


Its blacks who love bling the most, and its them who can usually least afford it.

John S. Bolton said...

That's quite a good observation:
"Everybody is satisfied with his intelligence, but hardly anybody is satisfied with his wealth".
One rarely hears of people being focused on raising their intelligence. The groups are concerned with their prestige, and needing state intervention to get past merit systems is very unprestigious. They need something like a regime of censorship to get the prestige of a better position or income by political intervention, without the ignominy of being from the race, or from the genetically distinct needy group.
Everybody is satisfied with his intelligence, though, is an observation which probably explains a lot.

John S. Bolton said...

That's quite a good observation:
"Everybody is satisfied with his intelligence, but hardly anybody is satisfied with his wealth".
One rarely hears of people being focused on raising their intelligence. The groups are concerned with their prestige, and needing state intervention to get past merit systems is very unprestigious. They need something like a regime of censorship to get the prestige of a better position or income by political intervention, without the ignominy of being from the race, or from the genetically distinct needy group.
Everybody is satisfied with his intelligence, though, is an observation which probably explains a lot.