Traitorous Attempted Cession Of Sovereignty to an International Terrorist-Support Organization, the UN, and Through Unconstitutional Methods

"U.S. under U.N. law in health emergency" link

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit in Canada released a plan that establishes U.N. law along with regulations by the World Trade Organization and World Health Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the stage for militarizing the management of continental health emergencies.
...Under the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, Bush agreed the U.S. would work through the U.N. system influenza coordinator to develop a continental emergency response plan operating through authorities under the WTO, North American Free Trade Agreement and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization.
WND could find no evidence the Bush administration presented the Influenza Partnership plan to Congress for oversight or approval... [from //lonewacko.com/blog/]

The Right Has A Huge Advantage Which It Is Not Using: Invocation of Loyalty To Citizenry Over Foreigners

The left is committed to its disloyalism; its minorities, its immigrants and their need for net public subsidy and favor over the citizenry or the net taxpayers thereof. They've painted themselves into a corner that way; but the right needn't follow. Immigration restrictionism has made a mighty groundswell against the cozy detente between the left and the right, in which it was tacitly agreed that the right would never use this or other 'wedge issues'. That time of forbearance in using advantage of patriotism against the disloyal left and liberal elites is likely ending now, and not a moment too soon. Evidence also is in the candidacies of Tancredo and Hunter and their gravitational draw on the others, even those with no credibility on such issues, like McCain and Giuliani.
Added 7-16-08 from: Monday, July 14, 2008
The Failure Of The Moderate Right To Conspicuously Oppose Mass Immigration...
of undesirables, causes hatred and suspicion to fall on the rich, which otherwise would have been a charge on the left.

For Each Cohort of Immigrants Loyalty Must Decline...

This is because they are not selected for certainty of being loyal to our citizenry above foreigners, and in the nature of the case, really couldn't be. Every year, loyalty thus declines, and this serves the power-greed of those who can increase their power from that circumstance. The loyalty of citizens to each other is an obstacle to the aggrandizement of power in many ways, but especially relative to schemes to transfer resources to the fast-breeding failed societies and their wretched populations suffering afflictions in the tropics.

Openness to Mass Immigration at Half the Standard of Income of the Majority Must Increase the Aggression on the Net Taxpayers of Our Citizenry...

...to whom loyalty is owed. Immigration cohorts that far down in the relative scale cannot avoid parasitizing those to whom loyalty is owed. Edwin S. Rubinstein has the figures:"Hispanic per capita income in 2006 ($15,421) was only 51 percent of the comparable figure for non-Hispanic whites."vdare.com/rubenstein/070904_nd.htm

Those Who Don't Mind Being DHIMMIs to the Moslem Should Not Get to Pose as Being More Than Hopelessly Second-Class

Someone who desires what is, by definition, second-class status to Islamic populations, and as low as those of Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Somalia and others among the poorest and most backward in the world, should not be treated as anything but as low as what they place above themselves. They place themselves lower than the people of the Sahel, and you should, too. In any case, they must be reminded when showing any such DHIMMI attitudes towards the Moslem, that they're being hopelessly second-class. This will show up when they speak favorably of Islamic immigration, political influence or other accomodation in civilized countries. It is especially necessary to put them in their place when they pretend to have some higher status supposedly conferred by being more anti-discrimination, more egalitarian, more tolerant etc.

Quality of Population is Everything, or Nearly So...

To determine this, that is, whether cultural changes from without may be the more important causal factor one should look at historical comparisons
in terms of miles, and relative cultural penetration.
If we have cultural explanations to give the leading role to, and leaving little
or nothing for genetic difference to account for;
how then could western culture with great advances of technology and science to show
IN SITU, even routinely at many of its far edges, have been able to penetrate thousands of miles, in 100 or so years,
where it had the same genetic substrate
to ride along on, and not be able to penetrate even
a few miles off the coast, almost anywhere in the tropics in hundreds,
even 500 years? 500 YEARS is a LONG time, and cultural influences are often mobile at speeds so high, and vaulting gulfs so profound between societies, that it cannot be assumed that they need, for example, military interventions, to travel long distances. If one says institutions have explanatory precedence over quality of population, one only has to observe or project the replacement of superior institutions' personnel with that of the world average or below, to see that the quality of population is well-nigh everything. No institutional set-up can override the effect of very low quality of staff.

A Hidden Litmus Test for Opposition to Immigration Restriction Applies to the Entire Professoriate, Left to Right

From www. Isteve.com, August 30th, 2007, entitled 'Carol Swain'----'Yale Law School Professor Peter H. Schuck observes:

"In a polity in which only 17 percent of the public thinks that immigration levels should be higher and 39 percent thinks they should be lower, one would expect that at least some legal scholars who write about immigration issues would favor restriction. If so, one would be wrong. In over two decades of immersion in immigration scholarship, I have not encountered a single academic specialist on immigration law who favors reducing the number of legal immigrants admitted each year." ...' JB comments:
Openness-valuing is an underlying minimum, one that is insisted on above all other demands, and this points to the needs of transmission of ideas which are damaging; which need, if nothing else, to command openness to ensure transmission.