Saturday, April 19, 2008

If Further & Further Degrees Of Outbreeding Are Valuable In Themselves Why Has Obama Needed Affirmative Action...

...and special tolerance or omerta, from the major media, to cover up his being one of the furthest left in the senate, and his extremely unsavory connections? Association with terrorists, corrupt fixers and professional race-demagogues would sink any non-minority candidacy; therefore he is still getting a kind of affirmative action, though not a legally mandatory one.
If Obama himself is a sort of hybrid vigor specimen, or symbolic of it, why the ever-so-delicate hothouse treatment of special protection, from the cold blasts of public criticism, that all politicians are supposed to be hardy enough to survive?
From earlier posts: Obama Is Implicated In Directing Contributions To Terrorist Support Networks
"Barack Obama and former Weather Underground honcho William Ayers funneled money to Professor Rashid Khalidi, a known terrorist sympathizer. Khalidi serves on the faculty of Columbia University in New York and is best known as the professor who invited Iranian President Ahmedinejad to visit Columbia University after he finished his speech at the United Nations. According to confidential sources, Khalidi has direct ties to the Palestinian Liberation Organization"from OBAMA WATCH of April 11th, and the Source more details from ANDREW C. MCCARTHY: “The Company He Keeps” Addition from an earlier post:
Part Of The Explanation Of The Rise Of Obama From Leftist Obscurity?
W. D. Hamilton wrote that the "majority of people are dissatisfied, wishing they were higher up, a thought which provides a basic reason why democracies (and especially, within democracies, such institutions as their state school systems) have to be unstable. We see a wobbly pyramid, and particularly within that pyramid we see certain side stairs all human examples have by which demagogues skip up a level or two so as to shout down to the restless base that the whole structure is somehow ‘wrong’. Under a different system, the demagogue shouts, ‘You could be higher too’". The following link provides a summary and access to the complete text: Of course this leaves out of account the consideration of whether 'certain side stairs' have got 'black only' or other such restriction enforced on them, but that's another question.
Only Toothless Yahoos Suffering Economic Marginalization Would Reject Obama
... and be stuck in bitterness, clinging to religion and guns, opposing free trade in stolen goods from the Chinese despotism, and even defying the view that the immigration cohorts can never be blamed for anything? Imagine how un-cosmopolitan small-town America must really be, if they don't like people who are different from themselves, such as terrorists or polygamous immigrants? How could they be so backward as to treat marriage as serious, are they racist or something? Why don't they see that power-seekers really want to help them, and could, if only they could get past their bigotry? All right, I know that Obama didn't actually say the above, but it's much the same as if he did, the attitude and context make it obvious enough.The left swoons over Obama insofar as he represents the hope for change toward MINORITY RULE, which is indispensable if one wants to get the majority out of the way of one's power-greed. To see them as obstacles, will also cause one to develop a negative attitude towards them, as in the above characterization of a leftist, liberal or Obamanable view of the 'yahoos'.
Additionally, from several days ago, some further Obamanables:A pledged delegate of Obama's has been pushed to resign and has been effectively DISOWNED, for trying to talk her neighbor's children out of a dangerous tree-climbing position, in which she compared their activity to that of monkeys. The ex-muslim Jeremiah Wright, of Obama's church of anti-caucasianism, from the black liberation theology of the exterminationist Cone, can't be disowned, though. From What is the opposite of a mensch, By L. Auster of View From the Right,"He excuses the three decade-long vile hate career of Farrakhan pal Jeremiah Wright as mere 'snippets' unfairly picked out by a hostile media, after saying a year ago that Don Imus should be fired for one insulting comment. And now he fires one of his pledged delegates for something far less serious than Imus’s remark—something, indeed, that probably was not even intended as an insult."An article in the New Republic reports that Obama "taught Alinsky's concepts and methods", and that Wright came from Islam, before becoming a minister. See Lizza's "Agitator"[continued in comments section]

1 comment:

John S. Bolton said...

[continued from posting]Is this one of the deep affinities which Obama "can't disown"? With the tutelage to Alinsky, though, Obama may be understood as an unprincipled, amoral, leftist activist. When principles, standards and 'bourgeois' morality are discarded as obstructions; what's left but the power-greed? Found on the La Salette Journey: The Wanderer on Saul Alinsky, by Paul A. Melanson:[begin quote]Rules for Radicals teaches the organizer that he must give a moral appearance (as opposed to behaving morally): "All effective action requires the passport of morality." The tenth rule of the ethics of means and ends states "that you do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments. [ellipsis inserted] you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat."- "Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this. They can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity." [end quote]
Obama Is The Favorite Of The Anti-Merit Activists & Of The Journalistic Mentality
There are those who have their hope for change tied into anti-merit policies. Then there are those who desire minority rule, and who do so insofar as the majority is a hurdle in front of their power-greed. To the journalistic mentality, minority rule opens up the possibilities for a great increase in freedom-for-aggression, the excitement of riots and cities put to the torch, and the ease with which they could live more completely in the moment, in such times.