A Glimpse Of The Pro-Diversity Future As the Diversity Managers Dream It

...with the two Asian senators at the spearpoint of this bold thrust at our sovereignty i.e.
a racial government for Hawaii with features building towards secession:
___ "If the Senate overrides the veto, it will speed the country’s embrace of a form of post-nationalism (already held by many elites) — a confederation of various races, ethnicities and interest groups competing for special privileges, exemptions and recognition.
The Akaka Bill creates a race-based government for native Hawaiians. Even its supporters don’t deny that the bill could lead to outright secession. In the meantime, the bill will produce a regime of racial preferences, reparations, and lawsuits fueled by ethnic grievance, victimhood, and entitlement...."
...as found in More Race Politics From the Un-Post-Racial Candidate
The broken pediment, or was he the Natural Bridge of Hybrid Vigor, is all for this split-off.
All three mixed-race senators are enthused over this fissuring along strictly racial lines. Two out of three of them are spearheading it with the Akaka bill. This points to what the power-greedy perhaps don't want anyone but themselves to observe; the mixed-race are not natural bridges but natural dividers. If so, why is this? At the frontiers we find the most warlike, and their increase is assisted by those further off the frontiers of conflict, so that those who can effectively stimulate that assistance through carefully managing frontier conflict to their advantage, increase numbers and their practices relative to those who are less able to manage this feat.
This is what valuing openness to diversity means in practice; valuing division and conflict and the power that grows from being the arbiter, and ever more arbitrary, ruler of the intensified conflicts and divisions. Competition for power is not always zero-sum. Forty dictatorships hacked from one republic offer hugely more power for those who ride Diversity to the top of the devolutionary racial sovereignties, although the nukes presumably would stay with the big remainder, and thus the international power need not atrophy that much. The wars that get us to the devolutions allow for essentially unlimited power Re: the citizenry. Even if every catalyzed conflict fizzles, there is still great increase of power to be won for each step towards the ultimate divisions.

When 'The Diversity' Means The Quota-Eligible...

valuing openness to diversity will mean also valuing the increase of quota recruitment.
More quota recruitment means also further randomization of the information contained in merit recruitment; therefore it is anti-merit. Pro-diversity is anti-merit, and valuing openness to diversity is a way of being pro-diversity. Each additional cohort pushes towards anti-merit society, but valuing openness to 'diversity' as above has no inherent limit values or thresholds, and would be even completely contradicted by the imposition of them. Therefore, necessarily, valuing openness to Diversity makes anti-merit society the ideal. Politically, diversity does mean quota-eligibles; the mention of broader diversity as of species and genetic mutations, ideas and cultures which are not needy, is only by way of analogy, used in support of pro-diversity as being for quota-eligibles.

Those Who Want Freedom-FOR-Aggression Favor Obama

and they have every reason to. Obama is a standout for taking the side of aggressors, possibly unrivalled in the legislatures he has so far been in. Although such a pattern is common among black racial activists, somehow Obama managed to outdo his colleagues among legislators. This could explain a large part of his appeal to the left, in that wanting freedom-for-aggression, and hating freedom-FROM-aggression, is at least a large part of what it means to be on the left.
The following quote from the Augusta Chronicle illustrates how far out in left field Obama is on this question of whether some must have freedom-FOR-aggression.
"- Obama was the only senator not to support a bill 'to report suspected child abuse while protecting the identity of the facility or person providing the information.' The bill passed 54-0-1 -- the one being Obama, who voted "present." It passed the Illinois House 117-0.
- Obama voted present 'on a bill in committee requiring criminals to serve consecutive sentences for separate crimes involving convictions for severe bodily harm or sexual assault, but didn't vote at all when the measure came to the floor.' The bill passed the Senate 54-0 and the House 118-0.
- Obama voted present on a bill 'making it harder for abusive and neglectful parents to regain custody of their children.' The Senate vote was 57-0-1, with the lone wolf being Obama.
- Obama skipped a vote on a bill 'to prohibit convicted sex offenders from serving on school boards.' It passed without him, 58-0 in the Senate and 106-0 in the House.
Adds the Times : 'The records also show Mr. Obama voted 'no' on a bill allowing police officers to execute warrants and enter buildings without knocking if there was a reasonable belief a weapon would be used against them; voted 'present' on legislation requiring that minors who commit gun crimes on or near a school be prosecuted as adults; and did not vote on a bill requiring fingerprint background checks on school bus drivers.
'Mr. Obama was the only member of the state Senate to vote against a bill to prohibit the early release of convicted criminal sexual abusers; and was among only four who voted against bills to toughen criminal sentences, increase penalties for criminals whose offenses were committed in the furtherance of gang activities..."
Power-greed, malice and the liking of freedom-FOR-aggression go together. Obama managed to stand out even from hardened black racial activists in the Illinois legislature, for taking the side of aggressors. He went the extra mile for them and then some; therefore he is an enemy of our freedom-FROM-aggression, and of all true freedom.

The Audacity Of Attempted Censorship Of Political Publication

"Obama isn't just ignoring or running from his past. He's actively trying to cover over it: His campaign has threatened TV stations with their broadcast licenses for running ads noting Obama's link to Ayers." quoted from this link to the Augusta Chronicle
as found via this one: Annenberg, Ayers And Obama In The Weekend News
which also quotes the (Minnesota) Post-Bulletin as follows: "Imagine if John McCain had a similar relationship with a right-wing militia leader who had bombed a federal building."

If A Presidential Candidate's Hero Was A Pimp Named Detroit Red...

later called Malcolm X, how Obamanable is the electorate which could vote for him?
Obama claims the pimp Malcolm X as a hero in one of his autobiographies. As found through this Parapundit Entry Permalink, Sailer says: "Obama wrote that the hero of his youth was Malcolm X." Speaking of obamanation, Jerome Corsi's book Obama Nation also picks out the pimp M.X. as a hero for Obama, analyzing those autobiographies of his. The effrontery of self-importance, of someone who could look UP to a pimp, yet consider himself good enough to hold high office, is very hard to surpass. What if McCain had been shown to have had Charles Manson as his hero or role model, is there any chance any major media outlet could lay off that information? Of course not, and that demonstrates the depraved double standard which is working in favor of the black because he's black, and left-wing enough to excite the interest of the power-greedy.
Added from: Monday, August 25, 2008

Big Media Dem'monolith, Terrorist-Friendly Keynoter & Pro-Diversity As Disease Vector Again
1-Behold the monolith: From Dissecting Leftism of Monday, August 25, 2008"* ABC News - (99% to democrats) [...] * CBS News - (99% to democrats) " More here
2- Ingrid Mattson: THE DNC INVITES TERROR SYMPATHIZER, JIHAD APOLOGIST MUSLIM KEYNOTE SPOT » & Leader of Muslim Brotherhood-linked organization gets standing ovation at Democratic Convention -if this isn't a white flag waved in front of terrorists, what would be?
3- 08/23/08 - Saturday Forum: A Former Consular Officer Says Anything Goes For Legal Immigrants With Diseases; etc.As suggested, the money trail was followed, and power-greed turned up, since 99% donations to democrats would antagonize many viewers and advertisers, it can't really be about how to make their media business more money.
Added from: Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Left In Complete Panic Mode As Swiftboaters Televise Obama-Ayers Tightness
From Stop The ACLU» Obama Camp: Prosecute Donors To Group Criticizing ObamaFighting back against Obama’s thugsby Michelle Malkin, shows the ad, which Fox News had been scared off from running, and which is panicking the left apparatus, making their side look as terrorist-friendly as they are. Attempts to suppress even internet coverage of the Obama-Rezko-Auchi axis are found at this Permalink.
Added from: Friday, August 29, 2008

Obama Had Islamic Help To Get Him Into Harvard Law
Muslim Obama Supporter Declares White People Deserve and Want to Have Their Ears and Noses Cut Off- this is the bestial patron of Obama, who got black racial activist Percy Sutton to push for his acceptance into Harvard Law School.
As found at this Permalink, Mansour the terrorist-friendly, Islamic leftist, money man appears to have pressed for Obama to get one of the black quota places at Harvard Law. This could hardly be a disinterested transaction; loyalty to Islam and its terrorist-adoring leftist faction would be an absolute requirement. The left has fallen to such unprincipled depths, that it can be found licking the boots of dark age Islam. The Coup, by Updike, indicates how Islam, leftism and racial hatred are capable of being combined into an ideology for dictatorship. Our major media are depraved enough today, that they could be thrilled by that possibility happening here.
Added from: Saturday, August 30, 2008

Major Media's Foamball Soft Treatment Of Their Black Mascot
is a disgraceful dereliction of a high responsibility, which must be punished relentlessly for years to come. Boycott nationally advertised brands if possible. The urgent need, though, is to make Obama lose and disqualify McCain. A Palin presidency would be an excellent retaliation for what the media and the powerful have failed to do regarding the vetting of Obama and even McCain, their second or fallback choice. As if to prove anew their perfectly depraved dereliction, the big media are crowing over the supposedly world-historical minority victory, of a first major-party black nomination for the presidency. Has it been noticed that only a few months ago, they were insisting that Obama transcends race, and that race doesn't matter; now he's the black candidate of history-making significance. I'm certain the electorate will react with negative response to the beneficiary of such rank contradictions, manipulation and gross dishonesty. The worst must be assumed as to why we can't have reported any negatives on this media-favored candidate.
Added from: Sunday, August 31, 2008

With Openness To Diversity You Get Unilateral Disarmament
The quota placeholder-for-president has the audacity to offer this leftist, ChiCom-obedient program:
"I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.
And I will institute an independent defense priorities board to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.
Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons, I will seek a ban on the production of fissile material,and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBM's off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenal "
...quoted as found via Steve Schippert on NR Tank here: 08/29 01:51 PM
Since diversity has no connection with positive value in and of itself, valuing openness to diversity as if it did have such value-significance, will result in placing positive value sign on negative moves, and especially openness to them, and such that a unilateral disarmament results, even a literal military one regarding nuclear defenses.
Added 9-15-08 from: Sunday, September 7, 2008

Far Too Much Is Given To The Black Man, & The More The Majority Gives
...the worse the hatred against the majority grows. If the presidency is given, the minority hatred will get much worse, not be softened in any way. No one is making this most obvious point, while millions appear to be proceeding on the opposite assumption. In that feeling, they have much encouragement from those whose presentations are neither sincere nor given in good faith.
added 9-18-08: "Military fears 'unknown quantity' Obama Fretting over 'apparent lack of understanding on the threat of radical Islam' ". Is it lack of understanding, though, or more like what he said in his book, that he stands "with the muslim when the political winds shift"? Why would Obama raise money and give Speeches for Palestinian refugees ?

Input: Diversity, Output: Boredom & Fearfulness

To a civilized society, an additional cohort of Diversity makes for a more boring atmosphere; yet a more fearful and panicky one at the same time. It is systematically this way, and the pro-diversity, with complete malice, rejoice in each increment of this effect. The diversity causes a growing and deepening silence, which stupefies with its thickening overlay of boredom. It is caused by speech codes and one-sided 'anti-racism' and 'anti-discrimination', mindless praise of primitive cultural imports, promoted with government money, and ramified with unknown language and other such divides. Language divisions grow, and the power-greedy become jubilant, celebrating diversity, even though it is only fun and hopeful for them. Fear grows and spreads, as the powerful enforce speech codes. As Diversity multiplies, hostile Islam becomes more likely to enter and spawn its terror offensives. The more open to diversity a society is, the more likely it is to be open even to warlike Islam itself. The pro-diversity in such a place are the most predictable in their ideas; their words tortured, unnatural, boring as government anti-discrimination statements, and tormented with fear of giving offense to those who may discriminate with impunity: The Diversity.
Added Friday, August 29, 2008

Valuing Openness To Diversity Is Quite Alien To The Intent Of The Founders
The U. S. constitution does not say that the government shall have power to force or promote openness to diversity. The bill of rights does not mention a right to impose openness to diversity. It is only in more recent and power-greedy times that officials have tried to change the meaning of freedom of dis-association into freedom-FROM-dis-association. Only recently have the fully depraved begun to speak of all foreigners, as having a right to move here on net public subsidy. Such a pretended right would seem to follow, though, if rights are prior to loyalty to fellow citizens over against foreigners.

The American Electorate Will Not Reverence Official Anti-Caucasianism

The Obamanation of Desolation, by Thomas Fleming, is extraordinary in explicitly laying out the conclusion that Obama comes from anti-Caucasianism. Without endorsing all the positions discussed, the main point would be that we are in danger of crossing a threshold, in which anti-Caucasianism becomes, through the possible election of Obama, an Established, State Religion, that is actually accepted by the majority of the electorate, almost like a referendum. That point very much needs to be made, and made more explicit and expanded upon. The establishment of anti-Caucasianism (as a state religion) has so far been the dirty work of tenured professors and shystering federal judges, all of them unelected, and much opposed by the electorate. The anti-democratic features of the republic have been exploited for the purpose of setting up that state religion; the racial one. Now we're asked to support the likely necessary next step, and vote for the candidate who comes from that religion of anti-Caucasian hatred, thus endorsing the official establishment of it.
This point as well, from the same article, is one that needs to be kept to the forefront:
"I can also understand why public school teachers, social workers, and other welfare-dependents vote for politicians who will certainly increase their income and power."
When all the power that is to be had from exploiting official anti-Caucasianism and the responses to it, has been milked dry, then it will be dropped, just as if no one of consequence had ever believed anything of the sort. Think of the Class War Determined by an Iron Law of History, what became of that; was it dropped because it no longer served the power-greed of those who were pushing it?