One 'Racism' Does Not Imply Every Other

...as is evident in that they contradict each other. More important though is to fully realize, within microseconds, upon hearing the term racism or its cognates, that there is almost certainly going to be an attempted equivocation and smear job. The equivocation will involve confounding racism [sense 1], which would be a belief in the racial-genetic inheritance of full concepts, with racism [senses 2 through x] not stopping short of racial mass-murder as an end-in-itself. It is as vicious and dishonest as that, plus more. The equivocation will also likely involve some thoroughly fraudulent definition of racism, such as not wanting to give the black man as much as could on a short-term basis be given. On no account may one give the assumption of good faith to one who uses the term racism today; they will have to be assumed to be lying until the strictness of definition is clarified. If you want to use the term, don't, use 'disaffinity' or 'anti-caucasianism', but in any case not the standard smear-terms, instead. The smears are used because no good argument is available, to those who equivocate on the term racism. This must be remembered and responded to instantly before or instead of denying their characterization of you or yours. Example: but America is racist...there's no decent argument for disloyalism regarding America, if there were you'd use it and not the smear approach.

Open Admissions as Openness-Valuing, Testing Whether Institutions Create or Merely Reflect, Quality of Population

Institutions which prior to adopting open admissions, were known for high levels of achievement, invariably fell back to the level of the quality of population within them, even though being otherwise still the same institutions. New York City colleges and certain high schools are prime examples of this effect, so much so that,the reversal of the downslide has been shown as well, when standards of admission were raised afterwards, the institutions in several cases came back into their own. Erasmus High school in Brooklyn with local zone students throughout, went from graduating several future Nobel prizewinners per year, within a decade or so, to the low and criminal end of quality of population, even though all the other parts of the institution such as buildings and staff changed little if at all during the main changeover. Nothing but the all-importance of quality of population, and the negligible importance of institutional characteristics net of quality of population changes, can explain this.

The Average Conceptual Ability of a Nation is Determinative

According to Linda Gottfredson, on p.8 of the online version of "Accidents and Intelligence": "No culture can sustain new practices, however, that impose cognitive demands on the general populace that are beyond the capacity of its large cognitive middle." This is why quality of population is everything or nearly so, and institutions mirror, but do not themselves create this quality which is indicated by where the broad middle falls. A country can subdivide itself so thoroughly that one element may have its own middle and its own economy and cultural level, but this will not be able to 'sustain new practices' longterm, as the lower group can hardly be persuaded to believe that it is genetically so unworthy, as to require to be kept from contaminating the upper group.

This Is A Law Of Life: The More Complex The System, The More Risky It Is To Introduce Random Mutational Diversity

"Furthermore, if the mutation rate is high, the size of the genome in question must be small to stay within the bounds of the speed limit -- thus organisms that tend to mutate quickly are those with concise genomes, such as viruses and bacteria.

The Shakhnovich speed limit also offers an explanation for observed differences in genome sizes between organisms with genome error correction -- such as bacteria, mammals, birds, and reptiles -- and those without..." From Harvard's Science Daily at http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/10/071001172753.htm

Moslems Are Not Really Tolerable Immigration Cohorts to Civilized Nations: They Bring the War Of Religion, Sound the Call to Arms

"Muzzling in the Name of Islam
By Paul Marshall
Special to washingtonpost.com's Think Tank Town
Saturday, September 29, 2007; 12:00 AM
Some of the world's most repressive governments are attempting to use a controversy over a Swedish cartoon to provide legitimacy for their suppression of their critics in the name of respect for Islam. In particular, the Organization of the Islamic Conference is seeking to rewrite international human rights standards to curtail any freedom of expression that threatens their more authoritarian members.
In August, Swedish artist Lars Vilks drew a cartoon with Mohammed's head on a dog's body. He is now in hiding after Al Qaeda in Iraq placed a bounty of $100,000 on his head (with a $50,000 bonus if his throat is slit) and police told him he was no longer safe at home. As with the 2005 Danish Jyllands-Posten cartoons, and the knighting of Salman Rushdie, Muslim ambassadors and the OIC have not only demanded an apology from the Swedes, but are also pushing Western countries to restrict press freedom in the name of preventing "insults" to Islam.
The Iranian foreign ministry protested to Sweden, while Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad asserted that "Zionists," "an organized minority who have infiltrated the world," were behind the affair. Pakistan complained and said that "the right to freedom of expression" is inconsistent with "defamation of religions and prophets." JB comments:Consider your religion and its prophet defamed here as well. Formerly these threats were directed at moslem apostates, but now look: they are explicitly making their death threats against others for publishing what Islam doesn't like. This is what the War of Religion is like, and more Islamic hostiles into the better countries means more and worse war of this kind.

Mass Immigration of Affirmative-Action Quota-Eligibles is Deliberate Public Policy For Conflict-Kindling

Each year conflict on a racial-ethnic basis is deliberately increased by officials, by means of mass immigration onto racial-ethnic quota eligibility. If this is continued every year, with never a move back in the other direction, the only stopping point is civil war on a racial-ethnic basis. Therefore, since officials enthuse over this process being continually pushed further, and express disapproval of its reversal through less immigration or less quota enforcement, the correct conclusion is that they want racial-ethnic civil war here. How could they? They could, if they want power and always more of it, and war gives them power, and if civil war is even more effective for getting more power.

'On Invented Phobias' Comment From Brave New World Watch Sept. 30th, 2007

[see sidebar links] The use of "-phobic" means a diagnosis, and, in these instances, one given on the basis of no knowledge of the individual, and almost always with zero to negligible knowledge of psychology as a subject studied formally. That is how x,y or z-phobic is known with certainty to be a smear job; it gets you on the defensive to stutter and blunder, trying to prove you're not x,y or z-phobic. The left laughs at the disgraceful ineptitude of [almost] everyone to their right, who even after more than forty years of this, almost never learns the most obvious thing: you have to say that it's a smear-job and that this means no rational argument is available for the smear-monger's position, which will sometimes have to be inferred from what they criticize. X, Y or Z-centric is much the same, except that it leaves no opening for you to challenge their credentials for diagnosing 'neuroses': these 'phobias' which are NOT in the psychology manuals.