Dec. 5th Supreme Court Conference On Obama's Eligibility

as found here: Is Barack Obama a natural born citizen of the United States?
Follow the links to explore the major media news blackout on this momentous issue.
also from: Thursday, November 27, 2008
Why the Barack Obama Birth Certificate Issue Is Legitimate
& from Sunday, November 30, 2008
Our Republic Must Be 'A Government Of Laws & Not Of Men'
...while Obama just defying the Supreme Court would mean most fundamental lawlessness relative to our constitutional law. Law, or personalities on a political stage, mindlessly vying for power, those are the alternatives. Personalities being treated as above the law because they have been fetishized by corrupted media, are not compatible with the continuity of the republic as such, as described above. The high court cannot reasonably evade this conflict.
& from Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Obama Allows Ineligibility To Stand Unchallenged
on the level of a Supreme Court proceeding: Solicitor general's office dodges questions about birth certificate complaint-- also see Berg to File Emergency Injunction Today, Awaits Answer from Barack Obama and DNC ...though they have two days for mail delivery (i.e. some time Wednesday) still left to respond, the verdict would appear to be that there has been an admission by default of ineligibility
& from Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Lots Of Information On Eligibility Lawsuits
...at this Permalink

To Fix The 'Credit Jam' Regulators Could Lower The Capital Requirements

but for those banks which increase their volume of lending, and in proportion as they do so. This would bring back home equity lending on a much larger scale, as there would be two ways to compete. One being to be the sounder and more likely to take over other banks, and the other being to increase lending for the consideration, and gain revenue while being under less-strict rules. The risks of inflation and unsoundness are obvious but perhaps not greater than alternatives.

Will The Fed Start Buying State Debt Issues

this is an odd jab at predicting the next move of interventions aimed at getting large sums out where they'll be spent immediately.

American Thinker Runs Two Articles On The Correlation

between the rise of Obama and the declines in market valuations: More
& see also The Obama Market. From October, and, for substantiation of the correlation and the direction of the arrow of causality, see : An Obama Panic, or Americans just wanting Obama to get us out of it?

From Alan Keyes Eligibility Lawsuit

"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void, Petitioners, as well as other Americans, will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal,"

Eligibility Lawsuits Find Litigants With Unquestionable Standing

as here. Also, from Friday, November 14, 2008
More On Eligibility Lawsuits
From this link, where quite a few are underway in many states: Obama camp: Lawsuits by citizens are 'garbage'
Added from Tuesday, November 18, 2008
A Commenter Draws Out The Key Issue For The Eligibility Lawsuits
From the comments on the next post down: "Indonesia, at the time Obama lived there and was deemed an Indonesian citizen, did not recognize dual citizenship, and neither did the US recognize dual citizenship with Indonesia."

"Unrepentant Terrorist" Ayers Gets Treated As A Moral Authority...

...by major media, as he pontificates on how there is supposedly no place in American politics for 'guilt by association'. All the while, Obama has been an applicant for the highest security clearance, and by no means to be given a presumption of innocence in that regard. The electorate had only to trust or distrust, not to indict or determine guilt. Therefore the story of 'guilt by association' is not known to be true or reasonable. The granting of moral authority to such as Ayers is in itself an indulgence of gross amoralism, of journalistic nihilism even.

The More You Hate America & Americans, The More You Favor Which Candidate...

for president, and which party? This is an inductive generalization, which you have either observed the underlying facts in support of, or not.

A Learned & Industrious Observer Of Obama Concludes As Follows:

"STANLEY KURTZ: The real Obama — the man beyond the feel-good symbol — is a far-left radical. “What We Know About Obama”"
To repeat and clarify: AS applicant for our top security clearance and the command-in-chief of the armed forces, a candidate for president must get NO presumption of innocence IN THAT REGARD. Addition: " report has come out summarizing everything these people did. You can read it here. The FBI file, some 400 plus pages, is available here." from this piece by Jim Simpson

Applicants For The Highest Security Clearance Must Get No Presumption Of Innocence

Regardless of what is said about 'guilt by association', the voters do not indict or accuse; they trust or distrust one or the other of the two. Each candidate is an applicant for this very high security clearance, and must win trust relative to the other, not just complain about being supposedly being judged guilty, when the electorate does not even accuse, in its capacity as voters. This is why long affinity for far left, subversive, even terroristic types, like Ayers and Dohrn, is an issue that can't go away. The application is for the command-in-chief of the armed forces, a responsibility which the electorate can't help but take seriously.