The Anti-Culture Has to Smear Concern for the Continuity of Lineages Which Frequently Show Good Achievement

...Since no rational argumentation can be found as to why we should want discontinuity for such lineages. The smears will commonly use false dilemma, equivocation and slippery slopes all the way to compulsory eugenics. Dubious dilemmas will be presented in which choices are limited to mass murder vs. unconcern, even aggressively state-enforced unconcern. Eugenics A will be equivocated with eugenics B, C, and on towards the far point of some slippery slope based on historical analogies or imagination entirely. All of this will be found to be propagandized for, and in the place where rational arguments were rightly to be expected.

Horrific Treachery A-Spawning in DC: Mass Amnesty For Foreign Criminals By the Millions on to Net Public Subsidy

Update: resounding victory over SA 2919 [BAD]DREAM act-Sept. 26th-28th [was] a period of danger for this anti-American piece of deceit, but there is still time to shine light on this proceeding, which can only transpire swiftly in darkness, where the powerful and unrighteous can deceive the honest. NumbersUSA [www.numbersusa.com/actionbuffet] describes the legislation, and urges that Senators' staffers receive phone calls, not just faxes and e-mails: SA 2919 DREAM act: " is still an amnesty for millions of illegal aliens [...]
Please fax your senators and let them know that you are aware of the changes that have been made to the DREAM Act, but you still find the DREAM Act amnesty unacceptable.[...] the following things remain unchanged:
- The DREAM Act allows illegal "teens" to petition for their parents, leading eventually to their aunts, uncles, grandparents and cousins:
[...]But as soon as DREAM amnesty citizens are over 21, they can bring in their parents who broke the law to get them into the country.[...]And because of Chain Migration, the amnestied "teens" can see their aunts, uncles, cousins and grandparents getting permanent U.S. residency as well.
- The DREAM Act does not Protect Americans from Terrorists and Criminals:
Illegal immigrants are not required to submit fingerprints or undergo background security checks at any point in the DREAM Act process. Therefore, DHS has no way of learning whether an alien seeking DREAM Act amnesty is a terrorist or criminal. This security failure is compounded by the confidentiality section of the DREAM Act [...] basically requires DHS to hide information about terrorist and criminal aliens from itself. If a DHS adjudicator at USCIS learns from a DREAM Act application that an alien poses terrori st or criminal concerns, the adjudicator is prohibited from alerting ICE enforcement officers at DHS, and in fact, if the adjudicator did volunteer such information to ICE, he could be fined $10,000. To cap it all, DHS is prohibited from removing from the United States all aliens, including criminals, terrorists, fraudsters, and other ineligible aliens while they have a DREAM Act application pending, even if that application is based upon fraud or the alien is ineligible.
- The DREAM Act Offers Citizenship to Illegal Aliens Who Lack Good Moral Character:

The DREAM Act does not require that aliens have a history of good moral character; it only requires that they have good moral character from the time that they apply. This means that criminal aliens, terrorists, and other aliens who lack good moral character before they apply get an amnesty for their pre-application period conduct, no matter how bad or extensive that conduct.
- The DREAM Act is Not Just for Young People:
Sponsors insist that the point of the DREAM Act is to provide legal status to “kids” and “young people.” However, the DREAM Act is not directed just at minors. Under the "new" DREAM Act, anyone 29-years-old or younger, who illegally entered the United States before the age of 16 and has illegally remained here for 5 years or more will qualify for lawful permanent residence [...]
- The DREAM Act is a Big Amnesty:
It’s estimated there are some 2 million illegal immigrant children in the United States. They are only a portion of the millions of aliens who will likely qualify for the DREAM Act amnesty, because the DREAM Act does not place a cap on the number of people who qualify, provides exceptions to the newly-formed under-30 age limit, and applies retroactively to anyone who first entered before age 16. Furthermore, the recipients of the DREAM Act amnesty will be permitted to petition for their illegal parents and adult relatives once they become citizens.
- The DREAM Act is Deceptive:
[...] the bill as written ensures that illegal immigrants don’t have to attend high school or go to college to qualify for the amnesty: they need only take an ability-to-benefit test and complete a 1-year vocational program to get eventual citizenship (and there’s no requirement that they actually complete their college education). Nor do aliens have to join the Armed Forces: they need only go to work for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration or Public Health Service for 2 years to get eventual citizenship.
- The DREAM Act is a Fraud Machine:
We know from experience that amnesty from immigration laws generates massive fraud, and the DREAM Act is no exception. Nothing in the DREAM Act will prevent a 29-year old alien from asserting that he entered the United States before the age of 16 and has remained here ever since. The DREAM Act is silent on how DHS will determine the veracity of such claims. The DREAM Act will actually promote fraud because it prevents DHS from deporting aliens who’ve applied for the amnesty until their applications are resolved – a process that will likely take years, because DHS lacks the resources to rapidly process the millions of applications it will receive. Even if DHS eventually decides that some aliens do not qualify for the amnesty, DHS cannot use the statements aliens made in their applications to deport them, because their statements are protected by the confidentiality section in the DREAM Act.
- The DREAM Act is Unfair to American Students and Taxpayers:
The "new" DREAM Act removed the in-state college tuition section. However, aliens who get the amnesty will become legal residents and will therefore be automatically eligible for in-state tuition anyway.
- The DREAM Act Puts Illegal Immigrants at the Front of the Line for Green Cards:
The DREAM Act requires that applications for its amnesty must be expedited, bars DHS from charging fees for expedited service, and fails to provide DHS the additional personnel and equipment needed to handle expedited applications. Because millions of people will file applications for DREAM Act amnesty (regardless of whether or not they eventually qualify), DHS will experience a significant backlog of cases that will necessarily slow DHS’ ability to process conventional business and family visas, and applications for naturalization. This will adversely impact our economy, and disrupt the settled expectations of intending legal immigrants to the United States.
- The DREAM Act Will Allow Dangerous Criminal Aliens to Remain At Large in the United States:
DHS lacks the resources to detain all criminal aliens it encounters in the United States, and so DHS has to pick and choose which criminals to hold for deportation. When DHS deports a criminal al ien, the detention or “bed space” vacated by the out-going criminal is immediately filled by another criminal alien. The DREAM Act does not disqualify anyone (even criminals) from filing an application and bars DHS from removing any alien who’s filed an application for amnesty. Thus, criminal aliens who have no desire to be deported will file DREAM Act applications to halt or slow their deportations, which means they will spend more time taking up detention space which could be used to house other criminal aliens. That means more criminal aliens whom DHS cannot house will be free to roam the United States. The DREAM Act also creates an opportunity for extremely dangerous criminal aliens to be released into the general population. By law, a criminal alien who is subject to a final order of removal must be released from DHS custody within 90 days if his removal is not “reasonably foreseeable.” As mentioned previously, the DREAM Act does not allocate resources to DHS to process the millions of applications that are sure to be filed, which will result in very lengthy delays. The result? A dangerous criminal alien who would otherwise have been removed from the United States files his DREAM Act application, and when that application stalls at DHS with millions of others, he can file a petition in a district court after 90 days to effect his release because his removal is not “reasonably foreseeable.” JB comments: what is to stop an illegal from qualifying under two sets of false ID, then getting disability payments under both names? They only have to enroll or have completed some post-high school course, which could be easy to get fake papers for as well.

Tancredo on Iraqi Refugees

..."their effort to admit these refugees is just the latest example of the State Department’s refusal to comply with a federal law that directs the government to stop issuing visas to countries who refuse to cooperate with the U.S. when we try to deport their citizens back to their home country – something that the Iraqi government has done with impunity since assuming sovereignty.” JB comments: If this kind of openness is in some way good for us, why is it not good for Iraq? It is greatly encouraging that we have a presidential candidate who mentions this, and indeed why should we endanger citizens by taking in likely hostiles, when it could be either zero or perhaps one at-risk 'collaborator' for every seven illegals they take back.

Immigration For Retention of Less-Productive Businesses Is A Severe Threat to The Momentum of Civilizational Progress

if an occupation or business cannot easily raise its productivity, that is all the more reason not to bring in immigrants to staff it as its wages fall behind those which are moving forward. Instead loyalty to advancement requires that we let the wages rise as high and as fast as needed to shift demand away from those laggard products and services. That is a large part of how it has happened that there exist even 100-FOLD differentials in per capita production between several nations. Within nations no such high regional differentials exist, which implicates migration and immigration as causal factors. Before one relatively populous region within a nation moved even to several times the wage levels as others, migration would allow retention of the less-productive processes there, until the inter-regional differentials had become sufficiently close to slow the migrations. The differentials in per capita production between the richest and poorest nations are of absolutely INDISPENSABLE importance for ages to come, to maintain the MOMENTUM of forward motion, of progress of civilization and especially technology. The more immigration the richest nations have which comes in at the same or lower wages, the more this will tend to take away from the momentum of progress in productive technology. The grave danger is of backsliding caused by immigration of the wrong quantity or quality, as occurred to transport technology soon after the 9-11 immigrants did their job, reversing 40 years of progress in that field in less than two years.

If Politics Be Largely Influenced By Heredity, The Genetic Character of Immigrants Is Rightly a Prime Consideration

When Alaska and Hawaii were admitted, neither could be admitted without the other, as this would cause a political shift in balance. Likewise with immigration cohorts, there ought to be high concern for not shifting the balance which exists. This concern should rise higher in proportion as politics is subject to genetic influence, directly or indirectly. Relevant information is below taken from Dissecting Leftism:
"John Ray (M.A.;Ph.D.) [...] Leftism is an inborn tendency [...] there is now good evidence from the twin studies by behaviour geneticists such as Eaves and others confirming that. [...] Eaves, Martin, Heath, Schieken, Silberg & Corey [...] found that your politics in your youth are mainly the product of the social influences around you (school and college indoctrination, for instance) but as you get older your genetically inherited political tendencies come to the fore. The most striking behaviour genetics finding, however, is [...] the 1999 finding by Eaves et al. showing that conservatism/Leftism is even more hereditary than how tall you are.
[...] And another article by Martin, Eaves, et al. (1986) showed that data on the transmission of conservative attitudes could in fact be explained by a model which assigned ZERO influence to the social environment and ALL influence to heredity. Putting it another way, the correlation between the conservatism of twins was high but not perfect but what similarity there was could be accounted for entirely by the extent to which the twins shared genes. Shared family environment was of no significance in determining the degree of twin similarity. "

The First Cohorts of the THIRD Generation of Affirmative Action Cases Are Now Applying to College...

...still needing the same specially reduced standards as their GRANDPARENTS got! American officialdom, and especially shystering federal courts' appointees, you are in blackest disgrace. The initial groups of third-generation quota-seekers will every year now swell and grow into a flood of millions. Outrageously dishonorable officials and their scholars pretended that they only needed to break the ice with some quotas, and the next generations would be on their own. The push for total power through mobilizing ethno-racial conflicts is not temporary, but an ongoing project, one that will last another 25 years, as was brazenly stated regarding diversity quotas.

The List is Ghastly Long of 'Principles' That Today's Left Repudiates By Making Common Cause With Islam

A quick start on that list is as follows:1-equality 2-freedom of religion 3-freedom of publication 4-brotherhood of all mankind 5-women's rights 6-humane treatment of criminals 7-patriotism 8-isonomy 9-progress of knowledge 10-experimental approaches 11-peace 12-understanding between nations 13-moral progress 14-improvement of education 15-tolerance 16-compassion 17-democracy 18-constitutional government 19-minority rights or privilege 20-openness 21-sexual freedom 22-anti-discrimination 23-inclusionism 24 anti-superstition 25-reason liberally interpreted 26-loyal opposition 27-presumption of innocence 28-anti-militarism 29-anti-chauvinism 30-anti-racism 31-anti-hatred 32-open-mindedness 33-anti-dominant preference 34-anti-judgementalism 35-labor rights 36-ecumenical erudition and sympathies 37-anti-xenophobia 38-contempt for war of religion 39-anti-essentialism 40-anti-authoritarianism 41-anti-patriarchy 42-anti-homophobia 43-anti-totalization, or opposition to conclusive global statements given once and for all 44-anti-fascism 45-anti-theocracy 46-human perfectibility 47- secularism 48-humanism 49- individualism 50-free trade 51-anti-exploitationism 52- marxism, even as reinterpeted 53-abortionism 54-family planning 55- secular psychology 56-logic 57-latitudinarianism 58-artistic license 59-acceptability of single-motherhood 60-anti-genocide 61-the valuing of discontinuity as in pro-revolutionary sentiment 60-the exalted status of the artist who shocks the prim 61-independence of scholars from outside moralizing and other such meddling, as with tenure 62-independent-mindedness as a virtue for anyone 63-eccentricity as likely valuable
[combined with the previous day's post]
The Left Will Continue to Make Common Cause With Islam
... even though this involves the repudiation of every principle they ever pretended to be for, because their first priority is to get despotism established in those countries which have been most resistant to it. This is how pathetic refugees can be very useful; as a trojan horse to help the left destroy freedom-from-aggression. They will betray every pretense of a principle, but not their allies, in this last-ditch struggle to bring low the successful societies. First the class war, after 100 years of prophecies of its imminence by the very topmost government scholars, failed to explode. Then the race war turned out insufficient as well, in spite of 40 years of high provocation by officials and their most depraved scholars. Now they've taken the plunge into the abyss of cynical manipulation: try to add the War of Religion on to those of class and race, and get leftist dictatorship where they've so far failed to. In the nature of the case there are no principles involved, and thus no occasion of revulsion from which the left would have to break up their alliance with political Islam and its expansion through terrorism. The left is thus today a completely depraved dhimmi, which can find no fault with Islamic atrocities.

Children are Born to Their Parents' Responsibility Not To That of the Net Taxpayer

of the country in which they're born. This is why birthright citizenship increases the aggression on our citizenry, to whom loyalty is owed, when it is granted to foreigners' children regardless of whether the parents will take responsibility or not. It allows foreign parents to ditch their responsibility on to those to whom we do owe loyalty, by giving aggressive privilege to those to whom no loyalty is owed.

Traitorous Attempted Cession Of Sovereignty to an International Terrorist-Support Organization, the UN, and Through Unconstitutional Methods

"U.S. under U.N. law in health emergency" link

The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America summit in Canada released a plan that establishes U.N. law along with regulations by the World Trade Organization and World Health Organization as supreme over U.S. law during a pandemic and sets the stage for militarizing the management of continental health emergencies.
...Under the International Partnership on Avian and Pandemic Influenza, Bush agreed the U.S. would work through the U.N. system influenza coordinator to develop a continental emergency response plan operating through authorities under the WTO, North American Free Trade Agreement and the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization.
WND could find no evidence the Bush administration presented the Influenza Partnership plan to Congress for oversight or approval... [from //lonewacko.com/blog/]

The Right Has A Huge Advantage Which It Is Not Using: Invocation of Loyalty To Citizenry Over Foreigners

The left is committed to its disloyalism; its minorities, its immigrants and their need for net public subsidy and favor over the citizenry or the net taxpayers thereof. They've painted themselves into a corner that way; but the right needn't follow. Immigration restrictionism has made a mighty groundswell against the cozy detente between the left and the right, in which it was tacitly agreed that the right would never use this or other 'wedge issues'. That time of forbearance in using advantage of patriotism against the disloyal left and liberal elites is likely ending now, and not a moment too soon. Evidence also is in the candidacies of Tancredo and Hunter and their gravitational draw on the others, even those with no credibility on such issues, like McCain and Giuliani.
Added 7-16-08 from: Monday, July 14, 2008
The Failure Of The Moderate Right To Conspicuously Oppose Mass Immigration...
of undesirables, causes hatred and suspicion to fall on the rich, which otherwise would have been a charge on the left.

For Each Cohort of Immigrants Loyalty Must Decline...

This is because they are not selected for certainty of being loyal to our citizenry above foreigners, and in the nature of the case, really couldn't be. Every year, loyalty thus declines, and this serves the power-greed of those who can increase their power from that circumstance. The loyalty of citizens to each other is an obstacle to the aggrandizement of power in many ways, but especially relative to schemes to transfer resources to the fast-breeding failed societies and their wretched populations suffering afflictions in the tropics.

Openness to Mass Immigration at Half the Standard of Income of the Majority Must Increase the Aggression on the Net Taxpayers of Our Citizenry...

...to whom loyalty is owed. Immigration cohorts that far down in the relative scale cannot avoid parasitizing those to whom loyalty is owed. Edwin S. Rubinstein has the figures:"Hispanic per capita income in 2006 ($15,421) was only 51 percent of the comparable figure for non-Hispanic whites."vdare.com/rubenstein/070904_nd.htm

Those Who Don't Mind Being DHIMMIs to the Moslem Should Not Get to Pose as Being More Than Hopelessly Second-Class

Someone who desires what is, by definition, second-class status to Islamic populations, and as low as those of Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan, Somalia and others among the poorest and most backward in the world, should not be treated as anything but as low as what they place above themselves. They place themselves lower than the people of the Sahel, and you should, too. In any case, they must be reminded when showing any such DHIMMI attitudes towards the Moslem, that they're being hopelessly second-class. This will show up when they speak favorably of Islamic immigration, political influence or other accomodation in civilized countries. It is especially necessary to put them in their place when they pretend to have some higher status supposedly conferred by being more anti-discrimination, more egalitarian, more tolerant etc.

Quality of Population is Everything, or Nearly So...

To determine this, that is, whether cultural changes from without may be the more important causal factor one should look at historical comparisons
in terms of miles, and relative cultural penetration.
If we have cultural explanations to give the leading role to, and leaving little
or nothing for genetic difference to account for;
how then could western culture with great advances of technology and science to show
IN SITU, even routinely at many of its far edges, have been able to penetrate thousands of miles, in 100 or so years,
where it had the same genetic substrate
to ride along on, and not be able to penetrate even
a few miles off the coast, almost anywhere in the tropics in hundreds,
even 500 years? 500 YEARS is a LONG time, and cultural influences are often mobile at speeds so high, and vaulting gulfs so profound between societies, that it cannot be assumed that they need, for example, military interventions, to travel long distances. If one says institutions have explanatory precedence over quality of population, one only has to observe or project the replacement of superior institutions' personnel with that of the world average or below, to see that the quality of population is well-nigh everything. No institutional set-up can override the effect of very low quality of staff.

A Hidden Litmus Test for Opposition to Immigration Restriction Applies to the Entire Professoriate, Left to Right

From www. Isteve.com, August 30th, 2007, entitled 'Carol Swain'----'Yale Law School Professor Peter H. Schuck observes:

"In a polity in which only 17 percent of the public thinks that immigration levels should be higher and 39 percent thinks they should be lower, one would expect that at least some legal scholars who write about immigration issues would favor restriction. If so, one would be wrong. In over two decades of immersion in immigration scholarship, I have not encountered a single academic specialist on immigration law who favors reducing the number of legal immigrants admitted each year." ...' JB comments:
Openness-valuing is an underlying minimum, one that is insisted on above all other demands, and this points to the needs of transmission of ideas which are damaging; which need, if nothing else, to command openness to ensure transmission.